New frontiers in international strategy

Abstract

This paper studies a new frontier in the understanding of International Strategy (IS). To explore it, we propose the analogy of the ecology of firms and places as a way to emphasize that the real problem is the colocation of different places with different types of firms. Locations are in fact the distinctive content of International Business Strategy. We deal with this problem with four different perspectives. First, differences across countries must be addressed with integrative frameworks able to represent the multidimensionality of ‘semiglobalization’, or intermediate states between total localization and total integration. Second, differences in the development of intermediary markets in a particular place influence firm positioning and industry structure in that place, but their impact also crosses different places, and it is endogenous to the ecology of places and firms in a systemic, integrative way that makes simplifications extremely risky in the design of competitive strategy in an international context. Third, places, firms, and strategies form a complex ecology that can be studied with a framework focused in understanding the geography–strategy link that incorporates different levels of analysis, new economic actors, and a set of primitives. Finally, firms around the ecology of places face the challenge of developing strategies and business models to serve the majority of humanity today excluded from world trade. It is a fundamentally different way to think about the ecology of places and firms. Overall, we present an intriguing New Frontier, with the capacity to impact both research and practice in the field of international strategy, based in understanding the interplay among firms and places. Journal of International Business Studies (2004) 35, 175–200. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400080

Conceptualizing and measuring culture in international business and management: From challenges to potential solutions

“…Even though the specification of a "distance" index, such as Kogut and Singh's (1988), facilitates econometric testing, it "masks serious problems in conceptualization and measurement, from unsupported hidden assumptions to questionable methodological properties, undermining the validity of the construct and challenging its theoretical role and application" (Shenkar, 2001: 520; see also Ricart, Enright, Ghemawat, Hart, & Khanna, 2004). Traditional distance measures are based on Euclidean distance, which makes the strong assumption that the "differences" in a multidimensional space can be collapsed onto a smaller number of dimensions (in most cases one).…”

Innovation Processes in Emerging Markets: Empirical Evidence from the Indian Insurance Industry

“…For more than a decade now, EMs have been called the new frontier in international business and strategy research (Ricart et al, 2004). MNCs (and also large national firms) had traditionally focused on serving the upper-middle class (top of the pyramid) and the emerging middle-class markets -often referred to as 'low hanging fruit', and ignored the vast majority of people considered too poor to be viable customers (De Soto, 2000).…”

“…Qualitative research, rather than traditional quantitative empirical tools, is particularly useful for exploring implicit assumptions and examining new relationships, abstract concepts, and operational definitions (Weick, 1996). An exploratory methodology has been recognized as being particularly useful for researchers interested in examining strategies in emerging economies (studies by scholars such as Hoskisson et al, 2000;Prahalad 2004, London andHart, 2004;Sanchez and Ricart, 2010;London et al, 2010 are testimony of this). In addition, qualitative research has provided some critical insight into innovation (Galunic and Eisenhardt, 2001).…”

Corporate social responsibility for sustainable service dominant logic

“…The BoP concept, as a new way of thinking and way of doing business (Hart and Christensen, 2002;Prahalad and Hammond, 2002;Prahalad and Hart, 2002;London and Hart, 2004;Ricart et al, 2004;Prahalad, 2005;Hart, 2007), may be a significant driving force for progress and for the creation of a new strategic approach. BoP refers to doing business with the poor at the base of the global socio-economic ladder who primarily do business in an informal market economy (London, 2007, p. 11).…”

“…Second, previous studies of the relationships between business, economic growth and living standards have been largely overlooked. Businesses can create shared value at the BoP through positive social influence and by considering the poor as producers/employees, innovators and partners/entrepreneurs (Hart, 2007;Karnani, 2007a;Sebhatu 2008;Simanis et al, 2005;Hart and Christensen, 2002;Ricart et al, 2004).…”