Association between Prenatal Care Adequacy Indexes and Low Birth Weight Outcome

Abstract

Objective To investigate the association between prenatal care (PNC) adequacy indexes and the low birth weigth (LBW) outcome. Methods A total of 368,093 live term singleton births in the state of Rio de Janeiro (Brazil) from 2015 to 2016 were investigated using data from the Brazilian Live Birth Information System (Sistema de Informações sobre Nascidos Vivos, SINASC, in Portuguese). Seven PNC adequacy indexes were evaluated: four developed by Brazilian authors (Ciari Jr. et al., Coutinho et al., Takeda, and an index developed and used by the Brazilian Ministry of Health – MS) and three by authors from other countries (Kessner et al., the Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization index – APNCU, and the Graduated Prenatal Care Utilization Index – GINDEX). Adjusted odds ratios were estimated for the PNC adequacy indexes by means of multivariate logistic regression models using maternal, gestational and newborn characteristics as covariates. Results When the PNC is classified as “inadequate”, the adjusted odds ratios to the LBW outcome increase between 42% and 132%, depending on which adequacy index is evaluated. Younger (15 to 17 years old) and older (35 to 45 years old) mothers, those not married, of black or brown ethnicity, with low schooling (who did not finish Elementary School), primiparous, with preterm births, as well as female newborns had increasing odds for LBW. The models presented areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve between 80.4% and 81.0%, and sensitivity and specificity that varied, respectively, between 57.7% and 58.6% and 94.3% and 94.5%. Conclusion Considering all PNC adequacy indexes evaluated, the APNCU had the best discriminatory power and the best ability to predict the LBW outcome.

Differences in Rates of Low Birth Weight among Prefectures in Japan: An Ecological Study Using Government Statistics Data

“…From 2009, public subsidies for prenatal care largely increased in Japan, and it was shown in a prefecture in Japan that this policy increased the number of prenatal care visits and decreased the overall low birth weight rate [34]. An association between low birth weight and prenatal care visits has been previously reported [35,36], and an increase in the rate of participation in prenatal care is a possible reason for the decrease in the low birth weight rate.…”

Rural Maternal Health Care Outcomes, Drivers, and Patient Perspectives

“…Receipt of prenatal care is an important strategy to improve pregnancy outcomes, particularly low birth weight, preterm birth, and stillbirth,36–38 however, nearly 1 in 4 pregnant women in the United States do not receive adequate prenatal care 39. Measures of prenatal care adequacy incorporate the trimester of prenatal care initiation, number of prenatal visits, and adjust for gestational age at delivery 39.…”

Classificação do pré-natal em maternidades do Espírito Santo conforme recomendações da Organização Mundial da Saúde e do Ministério da Saúde do Brasil

“…Estudos que analisam a assistência pré-natal consideram, mais frequentemente, a idade gestacional ao iniciar o acompanhamento e o número de consultas pré-natal realizadas (Heaman et al, 2019;Nussey et al, 2020;Osterman & Joyce A. Martin, 2018;Santos Neto et al, 2013;Vale et al, 2021). Entretanto outros critérios devem ser considerados na avaliação da qualidade da assistência prestada à gestante (Yeoh et al, 2018), considerando que a adesão ao pré-natal no primeiro trimestre e a realização de seis ou mais consultas tem aumentado bastante no Brasil (DATASUS, 2021).…”