Falhas ósseas nas revisões de artroplastia total do joelho

Mozella, Alan de Paula; Cobra, Hugo Alexandre de Araújo Barros

doi:10.1055/s-0040-1713392

Cited by 3 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 56 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“… 21 In general, surgeons prefer to limit amount of hardware being implanted in PJI patients. 3 Several authors claim that bone cement should not be used if bone defect exceeds 5 mm due to its physical properties. 9 , 22 It was published that bone cement augmentation should be limited to defects of less than 5 mm due to the risk of thermal damage of the bone and subsequent components loosening and knee failure.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“… 1 However, the clinical results of revision surgeries are far from optimal, especially in cases of major bone defects in patients with PJI. 2 Bone defect filling with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement loaded with antibiotic (ALBC) or/and other antibacterial agents is an unexpansive and safe method, 3 but usually limited to bone defects <5 mm of depth. 1 , 4 Some authors do not recommend to use bone cement for Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) type 2 and 3 bone defects (AORI, 1997) due to the risk of thermal bone trauma with subsequent implant loosening.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The First Stage of Knee Revision Arthroplasty in Periprosthetic Infection with Replacement of a Large Defect Double Cementing Method: A Case Report

Balgazarov,

Belokobylov,

Batpen

et al. 2023

IMCRJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim Large bone defects in patients with chronic deep periprosthetic knee infection is a major problem. It is widely accepted that bone defects filling with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement could be used only in selected cases of small bone defects (up to 5 mm) and less than 50% of articular surface due to multiple reasons: risk of thermal bone damage, inadequate cement pressurization and bone cement shrinkage, etc. Staged cementing for preventing bone heating and over negative effects of cementing on a thick layer of bone cement has limited support in the literature. Case Presentation We present the case of 4.5 years follow up after temporary-permanent spacer implantation in a 63-year-old male with chronic deep knee PJI and tibial AORI type 3 bone defect reconstructed via double cementing method. Results Method of double (staged) cementing used for reconstruction of epiphyseal tibial bone defect in a patient with fistula form of knee PJI shows excellent clinical results at 4.5 years follow up.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The First Stage of Knee Revision Arthroplasty in Periprosthetic Infection with Replacement of a Large Defect Double Cementing Method: A Case Report

Balgazarov,

Belokobylov,

Batpen

et al. 2023

IMCRJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The management of bone defects is a challenging issue in TKR ( Mozella and Cobra, 2021 ). Both the porous Ti6Al4V block and the UHMWPE block are suitable for AORI type 3 bone defects treatment ( Lei et al, 2019 ; Aggarwal and Baburaj, 2020 ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Biomechanical Comparison Between Porous Ti6Al4V Block and Tumor Prosthesis UHMWPE Block for the Treatment of Distal Femur Bone Defects

Zhang

Liu

Han

et al. 2022

Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: The management of bone defects is a crucial content of total knee revision. This study compared the biomechanical performance of porous Ti6Al4V block and tumor prosthesis UHMWPE block in treating distal femoral bone defects.Methods: The finite element models of AORI type 3 distal femoral bone defect treated with porous Ti6Al4V block and UHMWPE block were established. Sensitivity analysis was performed to obtain the appropriate mesh size. The biomechanical performance of treatment methods in bone defects were evaluated according to the peak stress, the Von Mises stress distribution, and the average stresses of regions of interest under the condition of standing on one foot and flexion of the knee. Statistical analysis was conducted by independent samples t-test in SPSS (p < 0.05).Results: In the standing on one-foot state, the peak stress of the porous Ti6Al4V block was 12.42 MPa and that of the UHMWPE block was 19.97 MPa, which is close to its yield stress (21 MPa). Meanwhile, the stress distribution of the UHMWPE block was uneven. In the flexion state, the peak stress of the porous Ti6Al4V block was 16.28 MPa, while that of the UHMWPE block was 14.82 MPa. Compared with the porous Ti6Al4V block group, the average stress of the region of interest in UHMWPE block group was higher in the standing on one foot state and lower in the flexion state (p < 0.05).Conclusion: More uniform stress distribution was identified in the porous Ti6Al4V block application which could reserve more bone. On the contrary, uneven stress distribution and a larger high-stress concentration area were found in the UHMWPE block. Hence, the porous Ti6Al4V block is recommended for the treatment of AORI type 3 distal femoral bone defect.

show abstract

“…Robust structural support could be provided by the metal block (Aggarwal and Baburaj 2020 ). Furthermore, more host bone could be preserved due to the customizability of the metal block (Kang et al 2019 ; Mozella and Cobra 2021 ). However, the application of metal block would generate stress shielding inevitably (Liu et al 2021 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The porous design of the metal block is an effective strategy for modifying the metal properties (Lei et al 2021 ; Mozella and Cobra 2021 ). The equivalent Young’s modulus of the porous metal blocks could be decreased by adjusting the porosity (Arabnejad et al 2016 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Porous metal block based on topology optimization to treat distal femoral bone defect in total knee revision

Zhang

Han

et al. 2023

Biomech Model Mechanobiol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Metal block augmentations are common solutions in treating bone defects of total knee revision. However, the stress shielding and poor osteointegration resulted from metal block application could not be neglected in bone defects restoration. In this study, a novel porous metal block was designed with topology optimization to improve biomechanical performance. The biomechanical difference of the topologically optimized block, solid Ti6Al4V block, and porous Ti6Al4V block in treating bone defects of total knee revision was compared by finite element analysis. The inhomogeneous femoral model was created according to the computed tomography data. Combined with porous structures, minimum compliance topology optimization subjected to the volume fraction constraint was utilized for the redesign of the metal block. The region of interest was defined as a 10 mm area of the distal femur beneath the contacting surface. The biomechanical performance of daily motions was investigated. The von Mises stress, the strain energy density of the region of interest, and the von Mises stress of metal blocks were recorded. The results were analyzed in SPSS. In terms of the region of interest, the maximum von Mises stress of the topological optimized group increased obviously, and its average stress was significantly higher than that of the other groups (p < 0.05). Moreover, the topologically optimized block group had the highest maximum strain energy density of the three groups, and the lowest maximum stress of block was also found in this group. In this study, the stress shielding reduction and stress transfer capability were found obviously improved through topology optimization. Therefore, the topological optimized porous block is recommended in treating bone defects of total knee revision. Meanwhile, this study also provided a novel approach for mechanical optimization in block designing.

show abstract

Falhas ósseas nas revisões de artroplastia total do joelho

Cited by 3 publications

References 56 publications

The First Stage of Knee Revision Arthroplasty in Periprosthetic Infection with Replacement of a Large Defect Double Cementing Method: A Case Report

The First Stage of Knee Revision Arthroplasty in Periprosthetic Infection with Replacement of a Large Defect Double Cementing Method: A Case Report

Biomechanical Comparison Between Porous Ti6Al4V Block and Tumor Prosthesis UHMWPE Block for the Treatment of Distal Femur Bone Defects

Porous metal block based on topology optimization to treat distal femoral bone defect in total knee revision

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About