2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41559-018-0482-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomics of habitat choice and adaptive evolution in a deep-sea fish

Abstract: W hile longitudinal and latitudinal habitat transitions have been proposed to define marine communities and promote intraspecific differentiation 1-3 , little is known about the importance of transitions along ocean depth gradients 4,5 , although substantial changes in species assemblages with depth have been recorded (for example, ref. 6 ), and relatively narrow depth ranges may distinguish closely related species (for example, refs 7,8 ). Understanding the relevant mechanisms will contribute significantly t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our data reflecting local adaptation in adults may therefore represent populations of individuals that had a broader or distinct distribution at earlier life‐history stages. An interesting parallel example may be the depth distribution of the roundnose grenadier ( Coryphaenoides rupestris ) in the eastern NA, where sympatric juveniles of distinct genotypes at specific functional loci (with fixed non‐synonymous variants) segregate to different depths as adults depending on their genotype (Gaither et al, ). Carlsson et al () also suggest subtle genetic differentiation ( F ST = 0.004–0.01) from the Porcupine Bank area comparing samples from ‘flat’ and ‘mound’ habitats during spawning periods based on eight microsatellite DNA loci.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our data reflecting local adaptation in adults may therefore represent populations of individuals that had a broader or distinct distribution at earlier life‐history stages. An interesting parallel example may be the depth distribution of the roundnose grenadier ( Coryphaenoides rupestris ) in the eastern NA, where sympatric juveniles of distinct genotypes at specific functional loci (with fixed non‐synonymous variants) segregate to different depths as adults depending on their genotype (Gaither et al, ). Carlsson et al () also suggest subtle genetic differentiation ( F ST = 0.004–0.01) from the Porcupine Bank area comparing samples from ‘flat’ and ‘mound’ habitats during spawning periods based on eight microsatellite DNA loci.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would involve the consideration of stock designations for the preservation of local adaptive characteristics independent of the level of movement, since selection can maintain the difference despite ongoing gene flow through dispersal (e.g. Gaither et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geochemical analysis of C. rupestris otoliths showed a clear separation of population units along the NE Atlantic Ocean (Longmore et al , , ). A complex depth‐dependent genetic structure in C. rupestris was revealed recently (Gaither et al , ) identifying genetically based ontogenetic depth segregation whereby juvenile populations inhabiting shallow waters exhibit mixing, but adults segregate by depth forming genetically distinct populations. In contrast, the roughhead grenadier Macrourus berglax Lacépède 1801 shows significant gene flow across North Atlantic locations (Coscia et al , ).…”
Section: Population Connectivity and Stock Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although neutral variation can reveal much about a species demographic history, in many cases, patterns revealed from outlier loci can provide unique insights into evolutionary potential and patterns of resilience (Stapley et al 2010;Guo et al 2015;Funk et al 2016;Gaither et al 2018). Particularly in marine systems where gene flow is generally presumed to be high, signals of outlier loci can help detect population structure (André et al 2011;Freamo et al 2011;Hess et al 2013;Candy et al 2015;Araneda et al 2016;Tigano & Friesen 2016;Attard et al 2018).…”
Section: Shared Adaptive Divergence Across Two Genomic Clusters Shapementioning
confidence: 99%