2013
DOI: 10.1038/nature12000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conformational biosensors reveal GPCR signalling from endosomes

Abstract: A long-held tenet of molecular pharmacology is that canonical signal transduction mediated by G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) coupling to heterotrimeric G proteins is confined to the plasma membrane. Evidence supporting this traditional view is based on analytical methods that provide limited or non-subcellular resolution1. It has been subsequently proposed that signalling by internalized GPCR is restricted to G-protein-independent mechanisms such as scaffolding by arrestins2,3, or GPCR activation elicits a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

28
686
3
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 699 publications
(722 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
28
686
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…While still activating intracellular cAMP, Gαs DREADDs act as a 'generic' Gαs GPCR, it is currently unclear whether this tool exhibits identical intracellular signaling cascades comparable to the endogenous Gαs receptors expressed within the BLA. We now know, for instance, that all pools of Gαs are not identical and that receptors signal to G-proteins in a very selective microdomain-dependent manner that is limited by receptor subtype (Irannejad et al, 2013;Puthenveedu et al, 2010). Studies thoroughly comparing the pharmacodynamic properties of Gαs DREADDs to canonical GPCRs, such as β 2 AR, are needed to provide further validation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While still activating intracellular cAMP, Gαs DREADDs act as a 'generic' Gαs GPCR, it is currently unclear whether this tool exhibits identical intracellular signaling cascades comparable to the endogenous Gαs receptors expressed within the BLA. We now know, for instance, that all pools of Gαs are not identical and that receptors signal to G-proteins in a very selective microdomain-dependent manner that is limited by receptor subtype (Irannejad et al, 2013;Puthenveedu et al, 2010). Studies thoroughly comparing the pharmacodynamic properties of Gαs DREADDs to canonical GPCRs, such as β 2 AR, are needed to provide further validation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, the spatial pattern of heterotrimeric G protein activation by GIV also poses a stark contrast to canonical heterotrimeric G protein signaling. Canonical G protein activation by ligand-activated GPCRs is initiated exclusively at the PM and may continue on PM-contiguous endocytic compartments [32][33][34] By contrast, non-canonical heterotrimeric G protein activation by GIV-GEM can be triggered at multiple intracellular compartments, including centrosomes, focal adhesions, cell-cell junctions, early endosomes, exocytic vesicles, autophagosomes, and more recently, on Golgi membranes (summarized in 30 ) (Fig. 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such activation is triggered primarily at the plasma membrane (PM) via a finite process that is rapid and completes within a few hundred milliseconds, and may continue on PM-contiguous endocytic compartments. [32][33][34] Right: Non-canonical G protein signaling that is triggered by GEMs are characterized by 4 key differences (from top to bottom) -(A) GEMs can coordinately modulate heterotrimeric G protein signaling downstream of diverse classes of receptors (signal input). (B) GEMs can activate monomeric G i a (as a GEF) or inhibit stimulatory G s a (as a GDI) using the same short motif, thereby coordinately reducing cellular cAMP.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current model proposes that activated cell surface GPCRs redistribute into early endosomes, from where signaling can be extended. Direct evidence that GPCRs and cognate G protein activation indeed occurs in endosomes came from recent experiments employing nanobody‐based biosensors in living mammalian cells [Irannejad et al, 2013]. In this report von Zastrow and colleagues used conformational active‐state‐specific single‐domain antibodies and detected two temporally and spatially separated waves of β2AR signaling and its associated Gs protein.…”
Section: Receptor Signaling En Route To Lysosomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both signaling waves led to the accumulation of cAMP by the enzyme adenylyl cyclase, reaching a maximum of two signaling waves within approximately 10 min. Interestingly, the second discrete phase of β2AR signaling is separated from the first wave by an endocytosis event and appears to begin shortly after the delivery of receptors to early endosomes [Irannejad et al, 2013]. …”
Section: Receptor Signaling En Route To Lysosomesmentioning
confidence: 99%