DOI: 10.1016/s0742-3322(00)17011-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

96
5,499
7
233

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6,426 publications
(5,835 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
96
5,499
7
233
Order By: Relevance
“…The main theoretical approaches have been institutional theory and positive accounting theory. Institutional theory assumes that organisations within a social framework of norms and values will adapt and conform to social expectations to survive (DiMaggio and Powell 1983;Oliver 1991Oliver , 1997Carpenter and Feroz 2001). Positive accounting theory assumes that accounting choices are affected by the relative power between an agent and a principal acting in their own self-interest (Watts and Zimmerman 1978).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main theoretical approaches have been institutional theory and positive accounting theory. Institutional theory assumes that organisations within a social framework of norms and values will adapt and conform to social expectations to survive (DiMaggio and Powell 1983;Oliver 1991Oliver , 1997Carpenter and Feroz 2001). Positive accounting theory assumes that accounting choices are affected by the relative power between an agent and a principal acting in their own self-interest (Watts and Zimmerman 1978).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over time, these expectations form the basis of rules that "function as myths, which organizations incorporate, gaining legitimacy, resources, stability, and enhanced survival prospects" (Meyer and Rowan 1977, p.340). In this point of view, firms conduct philanthropic giving so as to secure their legitimacy (DiMaggio and Powell, 1983;Scott, 1992) and enhance the likelihood of survival (Oliver, 1991). However, despite the argument from institutional perspective, very few empirical investigations have been conducted to test it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is described as takenfor-granted ways of thinking and doing that are socially constructed (Burns and Scapens 2000) and 'comprising routine behaviours which provide a way of coping in a complex and uncertain world, and which enable individual actors to make sense of their own actions and the actions of others' (Scapens 1994: 312). We hypothesise, therefore, that applied to risk management, institutional theory explains the external pressures on organisations for implementation (legitimation) and the similarity of risk management across diverse organisations (isomorphism) (DiMaggio and Powell 1983) as well as it being taken-for-granted.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%