2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00054-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of an environmental disaster on psychosocial health and well-being in Karakalpakstan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mental health risks associated with environmental degradation have been found in a number of previous studies (Van Haaften and Van de Vijver, 1996a, b, 1999Crighton et al, 2003;Van Haaften et al, 2004;Speldewinde et al, 2009), and this present study highlights the additional burden of disease arising from these environmental processes. In Australia, areas at high risk of developing dryland salinity are predicted to increase from 565 million to 17,000 million hectares over the next 50 years (NLWRA 2001).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Mental health risks associated with environmental degradation have been found in a number of previous studies (Van Haaften and Van de Vijver, 1996a, b, 1999Crighton et al, 2003;Van Haaften et al, 2004;Speldewinde et al, 2009), and this present study highlights the additional burden of disease arising from these environmental processes. In Australia, areas at high risk of developing dryland salinity are predicted to increase from 565 million to 17,000 million hectares over the next 50 years (NLWRA 2001).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…A recent study (17) showed that almost one-half of the population reports levels of somatic symptoms associated with emotional stress. This finding is comparable to acute environmental disaster studies in North America but higher than findings from chronic, nonacute environmental exposures.…”
Section: Psychosocial and Adaptability Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond biological plausibility, oil pollution and influence of exploration activities of oil industry in the rural communities could increase vulnerability including loss of livelihood and psychosocial stress [38] and [39]. For instance, loses incurred as a result of oil pollution of farmland, drinking water and fishing sources may have a knock-on effect to vulnerable individuals and families due to loss of occupational activities, income and leisure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%