2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-2681(00)00166-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asset specificity and a firm’s borrowing ability: an empirical analysis of manufacturing firms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
10
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, because R&D processes involve accumulation of intangible capital, i.e., capital that is hardly re‐deployable in alternative settings, such an investment has a low collateral value, thereby limiting the access to credit. Močnik (2001), using a sample of Slovene firms, finds support for the hypothesis that firms with a high level of specific, i.e., intangible, assets should be characterized by a lower debt/equity ratio.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, because R&D processes involve accumulation of intangible capital, i.e., capital that is hardly re‐deployable in alternative settings, such an investment has a low collateral value, thereby limiting the access to credit. Močnik (2001), using a sample of Slovene firms, finds support for the hypothesis that firms with a high level of specific, i.e., intangible, assets should be characterized by a lower debt/equity ratio.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…It is also the case that the intangible nature of the investment in R&D makes it highly firm specific and hardly re‐deployable. Thus it may reduce a firm's borrowing ability (Močnik, 2001). However, the partnership in R&D implies risk sharing, which for such specific investments is favourably considered by the lender.…”
Section: Data Set and Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such reasons lead to asymmetry of information problems, like adverse selection and moral hazard (Jensen and Meckling, ; Stiglitz and Weiss, ), that might discourage external investors, whose assessment of the expected returns is less reliable than the internal assessment (Ughetto, ; Czarnitzki and Hottenrott, ; Takalo and Tanayama, ; Czarnitzki et al ., ). Moreover, the intangible nature of R&D hinders the use of collateral by innovative firms to secure their borrowing (Bester, ; Berger and Udell, ; Hubbard, ; Močnik, ; Ughetto, ).…”
Section: Some Key Issues In the Relationship Between Public Randd Subsimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus far the empirical literature has largely corroborated these predictions of the TCE capital structure theory (Titman and Wessels, 1988;Balakrishnan and Fox, 1993;Kochhar, 1996;Močnik 2001;Benmelech et al, 2005). However, if we compare the theory with other work in the field of TCE, we find that the basic logic has not been fully developed in particular with respect to the equity governance structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%