2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2008.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human health risk assessment from the presence of human pharmaceuticals in the aquatic environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
101
0
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 215 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
101
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the 67 compounds assessed only 7 had PEC/PNEC>1 and only 11 had PEC/PNEC>0.1. Schwab et al (2005) and Cunningham et al (2009) presented human health risk assessments for a range of active pharmaceutical ingredients and/or their metabolites, representing different drug classes, using environmental monitoring data. ADIs were used to estimate PNECs for both drinking water and fish ingestion.…”
Section: Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 67 compounds assessed only 7 had PEC/PNEC>1 and only 11 had PEC/PNEC>0.1. Schwab et al (2005) and Cunningham et al (2009) presented human health risk assessments for a range of active pharmaceutical ingredients and/or their metabolites, representing different drug classes, using environmental monitoring data. ADIs were used to estimate PNECs for both drinking water and fish ingestion.…”
Section: Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Environmental exposures of humans and aquatic organisms to pharmaceuticals have been reported [19][20][21][22][23][24][25] and the associated risks evaluated [17,[26][27][28]. For example, human health impacts were assessed from exposure to pharmaceutically active compounds in drinking water [14][15][16][17][18] and edible fish [19][20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These factors have been accounted for in models such as GREAT-ER (Geography-referenced Regional Exposure Assessment Tool for European Rivers : Feijtel. et al, 1997;Schroeder et al, 2002;Koormann et al, 2006;, LF2K-WQX (Price et al, 2010;Williams et al, 2009) QMX (Warren et al, 2005; and PhATE (Cunningham et al, 2009;Cunningham et al, 2010;Capdevielle et al, 2008) which are designed for higher tier risk assessments in specific catchments. However, the application of such models is limited by data requirements (location and sizes of point sources and river discharge statistics).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%