2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.rbre.2017.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: The present study aimed to update the literature review on the prevalence of fibromyalgia published in 2006. A bibliographical survey was carried out from 2005 to 2014 in the MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, LILACS and SciELO databases and 3274 records were identified. Five researchers selected the studies, following the inclusion criteria: studies that obtained the prevalence of fibromyalgia. Fibromyalgia studies in associated diseases were excluded. When screening by title and abstract, 2073 irrelevant artic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
161
0
8

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 214 publications
(175 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
6
161
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Age, body mass index, accelerometer wearing time, season, occupational status, smoking (cotinine), education level and income were included in all ANCOVA. All analyses were carried out using survey [18] package in R version 3.3.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Age, body mass index, accelerometer wearing time, season, occupational status, smoking (cotinine), education level and income were included in all ANCOVA. All analyses were carried out using survey [18] package in R version 3.3.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other side of the diagnostic dilemma reflects the reality that two-thirds of patients who met fibromyalgia criteria did not receive a fibromyalgia diagnosis. Essentially all epidemiological studies take satisfying criteria as the measure of fibromyalgia prevalence (34). That most people who meet criteria are not diagnosed by physicians as having fibromyalgia challenges that assumption.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patient feels well informed and taken care of in his entirety with empathy. has been proposed as a tool to improve diagnosis of HTN, and detection of out-of-office HTN in subjects with a previous diagnosis, with a c-statistic (AUC) of 0.86 in non-rheumatic subjects (2). This model has not been explored in rheumatic patients.…”
Section: Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%