2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.rbe.2016.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wing shape is influenced by environmental variability in Polietina orbitalis (Stein) (Diptera: Muscidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is known that the individual or population variations of the wing shape and size are selected depending on the characteristics of the environment [ 72 ]. The architecture of morphological characters responds to the engagement between the demands of the environment and those of the genome [ 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that the individual or population variations of the wing shape and size are selected depending on the characteristics of the environment [ 72 ]. The architecture of morphological characters responds to the engagement between the demands of the environment and those of the genome [ 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in body shape or in the shape of functional traits (e.g., wings, legs) can greatly affect some ecological attributes like sexual selection [ 48 ], adaptation [ 49 ], competition [ 8 ], development [ 50 ], and predation [ 51 ], causing significant changes in important populational parameters such as density, morphological variation, fitness, evolution and survival. Very few studies have evaluated changes in body shape or in the shape of bodily structures in response to transgenic compounds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that limb size did not act as an evolutionary constraint as limb shape evolved throughout the Pleistocene, potentially enabling North American martens to adapt to fluctuations in climate and biome quite readily. Additionally, in studies that have found little to no influence of trait size or shape, many researchers have attributed shape variation to differences in environmental selective pressures (e.g., Bol'shakov, Vasil'ev, Vasil'eva, Gorodilova, & Chibiryak, 2015;Dowle, Morgan-Richards, Brescia, & Trewick, 2015;Glennon & Cron, 2015;Abaad et al, 2016;Aguilar-Medrano & Calderon-Aguilera, 2016;Alves, Moura, & de Carvalho, 2016;Grohé, Tseng, Lebrun, Boistel, & Flynn, 2016). This pattern can be seen in our earlier studies, which have demonstrated that bone shape and size in Martes has previously been shown to correlate with different environmental and climatic variables (Lynch, 2019b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%