Biology and reproductive capacity of Spodoptera eridania (Cramer) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) in different soybean cultivars

Favetti, Bruna Magda; Butnariu, Alessandra Regina; Foerster, Luís A.

doi:10.1016/j.rbe.2015.03.002

Cited by 23 publications

(24 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In recent years, the occurrence of caterpillars from the Spodoptera genus (Lep. Noctuidae) has increased and caused damage to soybean crops in Brazil [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ] and Argentina [ 5 , 6 , 7 , 19 ]. Within this complex, S. cosmiodes (Walker), S. eridania (Stoll), and S. frugiperda are prominent in causing damage [ 7 , 16 , 20 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Defoliation of Soybean Expressing Cry1Ac by Lepidopteran Pests

Murúa

Vera

Herrero

et al. 2018

Insects

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Lepidoptera, stink bugs, and weevils are important pests in soybean. For lepidopteran control, insecticides and seed treatments are used. As an alternative, Bt soybean was developed to control primary pests of Lepidoptera such as Rachiplusia nu (Guenée) (Noctuidae), Chrysodeixis includens (Walker) (Noctuidae), Anticarsia gemmatalis Hübner (Erebidae), Helicoverpa gelotopoeon (Dyar) (Noctuidae), and Crocidosema aporema (Walsingham) (Tortricidae). However, the use of transgenic plants, and the resulting reduction of insecticide against target pests, may allow other pest species to become more prevalent in agricultural environments. Soybean expressing Cry1Ac against different lepidopteran nontarget and target insect pests was evaluated, and its performance was compared with non-Bt soybean with seed treatment. The treatments were Bt soybean, non-Bt soybean with seed treatment (Fortenza® diamide insecticide, Syngenta, Buenos Aires, Argentina), and non-Bt soybean without seed treatment. Larvae of H. gelotopoeon, Spodoptera albula (Walker) (Noctuidae), Spodoptera cosmiodes (Walker) (Noctuidae), Spodoptera eridania (Stoll) (Noctuidae), and Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) (Lep.: Noctuidae) were used. The plants of each treatment were infested with larvae of each species, and the percentage of leaf damage produced by each species was recorded. The results showed that Bt soybean provided control of H. gelotopoeon and had a suppressive effect on S. frugiperda and S. albula. However, S. eridania and S. cosmiodes were not susceptible to the Cry1Ac protein in MON 87701 × MON 89788 soybean when evaluated by greenhouse infestation. Considering the performance of each species using non-Bt soybean without seed treatment, S. eridania would represent a potential risk in soybean crops.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Defoliation of Soybean Expressing Cry1Ac by Lepidopteran Pests

Murúa

Vera

Herrero

et al. 2018

Insects

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The following biological variables of the adult insect did not differ according to the cultivar provided at the larval stage: pre-oviposition duration (F = 0.26; df = 3, 34; p=0.8378), average number of eggs per female (F = 0.11; df = 3, 24; p=0.5440), embryonic duration of eggs (3±0 days), male longevity (F = 1.01; df = 3, 36; p=0.4015), and female longevity (F = 4.04; df = 3, 36; p=0.0142). Favetti et al (2015) evaluated the biology of S. eridania in four soybean cultivars and also found differences in the duration of the larval stage, as well as of the pupal stage; however, no differences in pre-oviposition duration, number of eggs, and male and female longevity. Fugi et al (2005) also observed a reduction in the larval stage of A. gemmatalis among soybean cultivars; however, contrary to Favetti et al (2015), the authors reported differences related to female longevity, number of eggs, and egg stage duration.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Favetti et al (2015) evaluated the biology of S. eridania in four soybean cultivars and also found differences in the duration of the larval stage, as well as of the pupal stage; however, no differences in pre-oviposition duration, number of eggs, and male and female longevity. Fugi et al (2005) also observed a reduction in the larval stage of A. gemmatalis among soybean cultivars; however, contrary to Favetti et al (2015), the authors reported differences related to female longevity, number of eggs, and egg stage duration. Specht et al (2016) assessed the reproduction potential of S. eridania in soybean and noticed that the number of copulated females was not affected by the size of pupae; however, differences were observed while analyzing egg fertility and adult longevity.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The incorrect use of insecticides and fungicides on soybean has also been identified as a factor that has contributed to the increase of this insect population, particularly by contributing to a high mortality of biological control agents (Sosa-Gómez et al, 2010). An alternative control measure is the use of plants that are naturally resistant to insects and that can be used for the management of C. includens in soybean (Rose et al, 1989;Piubelli et al, 2005) and dry bean (Morando et al, 2015), as well as of other lepidopteran pests species affecting the soybean crop, such as A. gemmatalis (Fugi et al, 2005), Spodoptera cosmioides Walker, 1858 (Boiça Júnior et al, 2015), and S. eridania Cramer, 1782 (Favetti et al, 2015). This control method allows reducing insect populations to levels that do not cause economic damages to plants, avoiding ecological imbalances and accumulative waste in the environment and foods (HoffmannCampo et al, 2012).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Natural resistance of soybean cultivars to the soybean looper larva Chrysodeixis includens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

Wille

Pereira

Wille

et al. 2017

Pesq. agropec. bras.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

-The objective of this work was to evaluate the natural resistance of soybean cultivars to Chrysodeixis includens. For this, four commercial soybean cultivars recommended for the Southern region of Brazil were used: BR 36, NA 5909 RG, BMX Turbo RR, and Benso 1RR. In the laboratory, larvae were subjected to the antixenosis feeding assay, in which they were free or not to choose among old leaves, new leaves, and pods. Neonate larvae were subjected to two antibiosis tests: in the first one, they were fed with leaves from the middle third of the plants of the four cultivars; and, in the second one, with leaves or pods of the NA 5909 RG cultivar. Chrysodeixis includens larvae prefer leaves over pods and old leaves over new ones. The Benso 1RR cultivar extends the development cycle of C. includens, but only BMX Turbo RR will reduce the population growth of larvae in the next generations.Index terms: integrated pest management, IPM, lepidopteran pests, plant resistance, Plusiinae. Resistência natural de cultivares de soja à lagarta-falsa-medideiraChrysodeixis includens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Termos para indexação: manejo integrado de pragas, MIP, lepidópteros-praga, resistência de plantas, Plusiinae.

show abstract

“…It has been recorded from 202 host species belonging to 58 families (Montezano et al, 2014). In the last few years, S. eridania has been recognized as a pest of annual crops, such as cotton Gossypium hirsutum L. and soybean Glycine max (L.) (Favetti et al, 2015;Santos et al, 2005Santos et al, , 2010, tomato Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. (Miranda et al, 2005), and strawberry Fragaria x ananassa Duch.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development and reprotuction of Spodoptera eridania on natural hosts and artificial diet

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The development and reproductive potential of Spodoptera eridania (Stoll, 1782) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) was compared on natural and artificial diets. Its biology was determined under laboratory conditions, providing an artificial diet, leaves of white clover and the peach cultivar 'Chimarrita' and fruits and leaves of the apple cultivar 'Gala'. Larvae of S. eridania could not complete their biological cycle when fed on apple fruits or peach leaves. The artificial diet provided the shortest development time, with a cycle of 28.5±0.14 days from egg to adult and 37.3% total viability. Apple leaves led to a longer development time from egg to adult (62.8±1.22 days) and lower total viability (23%) and white clover provided the highest total viability (54.3%). The results showed that S. eridania can use white clover and apple leaves to develop normally in apple orchards. The reduction of food sources such as white clover used by the larvae results in infestation and damage to fruits from "test bites".

show abstract

Biology and reproductive capacity of Spodoptera eridania (Cramer) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) in different soybean cultivars

Cited by 23 publications

References 18 publications

Defoliation of Soybean Expressing Cry1Ac by Lepidopteran Pests

Defoliation of Soybean Expressing Cry1Ac by Lepidopteran Pests

Natural resistance of soybean cultivars to the soybean looper larva Chrysodeixis includens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

Development and reprotuction of Spodoptera eridania on natural hosts and artificial diet

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About