2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.10.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite element analysis modelling of proximal femoral fractures, including post-fixation periprosthetic fractures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The interfragmentary motion is limited, but this may lead to less bone formation, higher bone resorption and consequently fixation loosening [13,56,57]. Furthermore, the direct contact between the screws and bone might lead to disruption of the blood supply [58]. No significant difference was observed between the 8 and 7-screw constructs (C1, C2 and C3, Figure 4(a)).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interfragmentary motion is limited, but this may lead to less bone formation, higher bone resorption and consequently fixation loosening [13,56,57]. Furthermore, the direct contact between the screws and bone might lead to disruption of the blood supply [58]. No significant difference was observed between the 8 and 7-screw constructs (C1, C2 and C3, Figure 4(a)).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Periprosthetic fractures occur around or adjacent to prosthetic joints or orthopedic implants. 1 Currently, 0.8% to 1.1% of total hip arthroplasty (THA) and 0.5% to 1.1% of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients will experience a periprosthetic fracture in the first 5 years from surgery, and these numbers are expected to increase. 2 6 The indications for THA are expanding, leading to more implants in younger patients, as well as in older adults.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A methodology for assessing the causes of a given scenario is the use of Finite Element (FE) analysis. In the biomechanical evaluation of osteosynthesis medical devices, many applications can be found in the literature (Dubov et al, 2011;Noor et al, 2013), but to the authors' knowledge this is the first investigation aimed at evaluating the causes of a real failure event after a re-intervention following PFF. Such events are currently object of forensic debate as more and more often hospitals, surgeons, and medical device manufacturers are denounced by patients to whom similar events occur.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%