2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjp.2015.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of chitosan and its quaternized derivative on E. coli and S. aureus growth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

11
182
2
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 384 publications
(198 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
11
182
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Table (2) demonstrated that the MIC values for S. aureus appeared to be lower than that measured for E. coli, as it was 0.0008% CS L , while the MIC values for E. coli was 0.001% CS L . The results of both bacteria are in complete agreement to several examples found in the literature such as Goy et al, (2016) as they studied the antibacterial activity and showed that the Chitosan is consistently more active against the Gram-positive S. aureus than Gram-negative E. coli. Also these results were in agreement to those reported by Fujikawa and Morozumi, (2006) who studied the MIC of S. aureus and E. coli.…”
Section: Rersults and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Table (2) demonstrated that the MIC values for S. aureus appeared to be lower than that measured for E. coli, as it was 0.0008% CS L , while the MIC values for E. coli was 0.001% CS L . The results of both bacteria are in complete agreement to several examples found in the literature such as Goy et al, (2016) as they studied the antibacterial activity and showed that the Chitosan is consistently more active against the Gram-positive S. aureus than Gram-negative E. coli. Also these results were in agreement to those reported by Fujikawa and Morozumi, (2006) who studied the MIC of S. aureus and E. coli.…”
Section: Rersults and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Also similar results observed by (Goy et al, 2016) they demonstrated the growth of E. coli and S. aureus, as measured by turbidity. Both bacteria grow in a similar way but with differences in turbidity.…”
Section: Rersults and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chitosan films with gelatin/glycerol showed some antimicrobial effect, but it did not show an inhibitory zone towards microorganisms. This is predictable as chitosan itself has the natural characteristic of antimicrobial activity (Goy et al, 2016). Chitosan, as a solid material, is unable to spread through the agar media, so chitosanactive sites only inhibited organisms that were in direct contact with it (Sanchez-Machado et al, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be explained by the reported more significant effect of CH against Gramnegative bacteria like E. coli (Cárdenas et al, 2008., Goy et al, 2016. The incorporation of microspheres (containing the active compound) into the CH films had a significant effect in the growth of both L. innocua and E. coli, as compared to non-coated samples (control) and sample coated with pure CH films.…”
Section: Antimicrobial Activitymentioning
confidence: 81%