Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was no significant difference in operative length when comparing the standard technique to the minimally invasive technique previously described (10). This duration is comparable with that reported in Goldstein et al's CMR data, where a mean length of surgery of 52 minutes was reported across 44 procedures; other studies have reported operative times for device insertion of 71 to 119 minutes (7–9).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There was no significant difference in operative length when comparing the standard technique to the minimally invasive technique previously described (10). This duration is comparable with that reported in Goldstein et al's CMR data, where a mean length of surgery of 52 minutes was reported across 44 procedures; other studies have reported operative times for device insertion of 71 to 119 minutes (7–9).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Piezoelectricity relies on the properties of certain crystals, ceramics, and polymers to bend under compressive and tensive forces in converting mechanical energy to electrical current or vice versa. To date, only a limited number of studies of the novel active transcutaneous piezoelectric BC implant have been published (7–9). The present study expands on this existing literature by examining audiometric and surgical outcomes among 23 subjects who have been implanted with the device.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Osia does also provide a benefit for speech recognition in noise [ 4 , 8 ]. Subjective evaluation using the SSQ, APHAB, and HUI showed benefit for Osia recipients [ 8 , 11 13 ], and our long-term data revealed the largest benefit at > 36 months of Osia experience.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Gawecki et al (2020) showed higher speech recognition scores as well as larger self-reported QoL with the Osia compared to the Baha Attract [ 11 ], while Pla-Gil et al (2021) compared a control group of ten patients using a Baha 5 Power Connect with a group of 10 Osia 1 patients and found a comparable hearing performance in terms of both audiological and subjective outcomes [ 13 ]. As a consequence, Osia can be regarded as similarly effective treatment to other percutaneous BAHS with the highest audiological output, and as superior to other transcutaneous bone conduction devices (Ellsperman et al (2021) provided an overview [ 14 ]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second generation Vistafix implants (dimensions: full implant length 5.35 mm, bone embedded length 4 mm, and diameter 4.475 mm; the diameter of the collar at its widest point 5.2 mm [10]) are implanted in the bones of the skull, most often in the temporal bone, zygomatic bone, frontal bone, maxilla [3,8,10,42]. According to the literature on the anatomy and surgery of laryngological hearing implant implantation, it appears that the thickness of the temporal bone in places of implantation is at least 5.55 ± 1.46 mm on average, and it even reaches 11.15 ± 1.86 mm [43][44][45][46]. Therefore, following the anatomy of the skull and the dimensions of the implant itself, the selected model allows you to freely create a hole for the VXI300 implant (without damaging the side walls of the cube) and the entire surface.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Printout Of Calibration Models And The Cou...mentioning
confidence: 99%