2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjid.2016.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abnormal anal cytology risk in women with known genital squamous intraepithelial lesion

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to assess the risk of abnormal anal cytology in women with known genital squamous intraepithelial lesion. This study evaluated 200 women with and without genital squamous intraepithelial lesion who were recruited for anal Pap smears. Women who had abnormal results on equally or over atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance were classified as having abnormal anal cytology. A multiple logistic regression analysis (stepwise) was performed to identify the risk for developi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
8
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We did not take into account the time since the organ transplant for each patient, but it was already demonstrated that no significant differences were observed for women with abnormalities in a cervical smear in relation to the time since the transplant procedure. 19 However, this observation is very similar to a study that used the same liquid-based cytology. Using another liquid-based cytology assay, Patel et al 18 found that fewer than 10% of patients displayed anal atypia in renal transplant recipients, which included both men and women.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We did not take into account the time since the organ transplant for each patient, but it was already demonstrated that no significant differences were observed for women with abnormalities in a cervical smear in relation to the time since the transplant procedure. 19 However, this observation is very similar to a study that used the same liquid-based cytology. Using another liquid-based cytology assay, Patel et al 18 found that fewer than 10% of patients displayed anal atypia in renal transplant recipients, which included both men and women.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…18 The prevalence of anal cytologic atypia is very high compared with those observed in immunocompetent women using conventional cytology. 19 However, this observation is very similar to a study that used the same liquid-based cytology. 15 Thus, it is possible that the persistence of the viral infection is more important than the presence of atypia.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Studies have shown that women with genital SILs have a higher risk of anal SILs and anal carcinoma. 10 18 19…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Se ha reportado una sensibilidad y una especificidad de la citología anal de 77,3 y 55,5 %, respectivamente, para la detección de NIA (20). Por otra parte, dada la asociación de VPH con la NIA, surge la pregunta sobre si la prueba de detección de VPH-AR podría ser utilizada para la tamización de la NIA de manera similar a como se utiliza para la neoplasia intraepitelial cervical (NIC) (21-23) por lo que un resultado negativo en la prueba de VPH-AR podría evitar procedimientos diagnósticos innecesarios (24). Como paso inicial es importante identificar la prevalencia de la infección del VPH-AR en la región anal en poblaciones de alto riesgo, para determinar la magnitud del problema localmente y, con base en esta prevalencia, evaluar el desempeño operativo de las pruebas de tamización o confirmatorias (25,26).…”
Section: Introducciónunclassified