2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjhh.2015.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limitations of performance status assessment in elderly with acute myeloid leukemia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(18 reference statements)
1
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are indications from some studies that performance status assessment does not give the entire quality of life picture of the patient such that while PS gives adequate information on functional autonomy of the patient, it provides limited information on other aspects of health that are important to the patient. 11 This study reveals that the mean age of these men presenting with metastatic hormone naïve prostate cancer is 70.62 ± 7.34 which is similar to ndings from other studies. 12,13 The median serum total prostate-speci c antigen (tPSA) of 83.70(IQR 47.90-107.00) is also similar to ndings from other studies as well.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…There are indications from some studies that performance status assessment does not give the entire quality of life picture of the patient such that while PS gives adequate information on functional autonomy of the patient, it provides limited information on other aspects of health that are important to the patient. 11 This study reveals that the mean age of these men presenting with metastatic hormone naïve prostate cancer is 70.62 ± 7.34 which is similar to ndings from other studies. 12,13 The median serum total prostate-speci c antigen (tPSA) of 83.70(IQR 47.90-107.00) is also similar to ndings from other studies as well.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…40,[42][43][44] Medical oncologists, having recognized the link between geriatric conditions and cancer treatment outcomes more than 2 decades ago, have developed [32][33][34] and validated 32,34 chemotherapy toxicity risk prediction tools that evaluate key health domains in older adults (e.g., functional status, comorbidity, cognition, and nutritional status) and predict the occurrence of grade 3 or higher adverse events according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 45 from chemotherapy with higher accuracy than traditional oncology performance measures (e.g., Karnofsky performance status). 46,47 As a result, geriatric assessment is now recommended by ASCO before chemotherapy initiation in older adults. 48 However, in radiation oncology, the data are nascent, and little is known about the relevance of geriatric assessment to outcomes from RT.…”
Section: Disparities In the Care Of Older Adults: A Radiation Oncologist's Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirteen percent of all participants were dependent in 1 or more ADL/IADL (20% of younger adults vs. 5% of older adults). Only 5% of all participants had a patient-reported KPS < 80% and 2.5% had a physician-reported KPS < 80% (KPS ≥ 80% indicates good performance status [ 30 ]). There was more variability on the Physical Functioning subscale of the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) with a mean score for all participants of 77 (SD = 20) and a range of 25–100 on a scale of 0–100 [ 31 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%