2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102868
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Over-selectivity occurs when one element of a complex-stimulus controls behavior at the expense of other equally elements of that stimulus; a phenomenon common in populations subject to cognitive challenge. However, lack of theoretically-based analysis, may have hindered understanding and remediation of the practically-important overselectivity phenomena. Current studies examined whether associative theories applied to overshadowing, a similar phenomenon in the context of conditioning experiments, could be app… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we used a relatively large number of training trials that, at the end of training, revealed maximal responding in Experiment 1A. It has previously been reported that the amount of training is a variable that can determine cue-competition; increasing the number of trials has been shown to attenuate competition both in rodents and humans (e.g., in rodents, Bellingham & Gillette, 1981; Stout et al, 2003; in humans Reed & Quigley, 2019). Indeed, overshadowing is sometimes reported even after a single training trial, a phenomenon known as one-trial overshadowing (see Haesen et al, 2017, for a recent example in humans).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we used a relatively large number of training trials that, at the end of training, revealed maximal responding in Experiment 1A. It has previously been reported that the amount of training is a variable that can determine cue-competition; increasing the number of trials has been shown to attenuate competition both in rodents and humans (e.g., in rodents, Bellingham & Gillette, 1981; Stout et al, 2003; in humans Reed & Quigley, 2019). Indeed, overshadowing is sometimes reported even after a single training trial, a phenomenon known as one-trial overshadowing (see Haesen et al, 2017, for a recent example in humans).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possibility is that the degree of overselectivity and the effects of revaluation depend on the strength of associations between stimulus elements. In a recent study, and drawing on the associative‐learning literature, Reynolds and Reed (2018) suggested that stronger within‐compound associations reduce cue competition and thus result in lower overselectivity and mediated extinction, whereas weaker associations increase cue competition and produce higher overselectivity and retrospective revaluation (see also Liljeholm & Balleine, 2009; Reed & Quigley, 2019; Shevill & Hall, 2004; Sissons et al, 2009; Westbrook et al, 1983). In support of this, Reynolds and Reed showed that shorter durations of compound‐stimulus presentation during discrimination training—a manipulation previously shown to weaken within‐compound associations in associative‐learning paradigms—produced higher overselectivity and retrospective revaluation, whereas longer durations produced lower overselectivity and mediated extinction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, investigating the role of within‐ and between‐compound associations may be a promising avenue to understanding stimulus overselectivity and changes in control by underselected stimuli following revaluation (see also Reed & Quigley, 2019; Reynolds & Reed, 2018). This is interesting both theoretically and practically.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%