1994
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9673(94)80545-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of phenoxyalkanoic acids and other acidic herbicides at the low ppt level in water applying solid-phase extraction with RP-C18 materi

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another official method reported in Germany uses LC/MS/MS to get an LOD of 10 ppb (http://www.bfr.bund.de/cd/5832) [23]. Other non-official GC methods reported LOD values varying from 0.01 to 1 ppb [16,17]. Because derivatization and subsequent cleanup were required for clopyralid trace analysis by GC, LC is deemed more suited due to simplicity in sample preparation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another official method reported in Germany uses LC/MS/MS to get an LOD of 10 ppb (http://www.bfr.bund.de/cd/5832) [23]. Other non-official GC methods reported LOD values varying from 0.01 to 1 ppb [16,17]. Because derivatization and subsequent cleanup were required for clopyralid trace analysis by GC, LC is deemed more suited due to simplicity in sample preparation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the 1990s, with the need to analyze polar pesticides and the advancement of LC column technology, LC gained more attention [9][10][11][12][13][14][15] because it avoided the chemical derivatization, which was otherwise required in GC. In the same period, GC with MS detection attained popularity because it not only demonstrated a lower limit of detection (LOD) particularly with selective ion monitoring mode as compared with electron capture detection, but more importantly, it also provided reliable identification to minimize false positives in pesticide residue screening [15][16][17]. The overall trend for pesticide analysis at present shifts towards the hyphenation of MS with either LC or GC [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] where in most cases, LC/tandem MS outperformed GC/MS in sensitivity, applicability and ease of sample preparation [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The matrix solid-phase dispersion (MSPD) technique with slight modification was employed for the cleanup of samples. This technique is suitable for the clean-up of homogeneously dispersed samples and can be applied to GC or GC/MS analysis [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. After extraction, the samples were injected into the automated online GPC-GC/MS system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solid phase extraction has clearly dominated the analytical processes of extraction of phenoxy herbicides from water or other complex matrices, particularly for liquid chromatography or gas chromatography separation and detection (Leon-Gonzalez 2000; Peruzzi et al, 2000;Lagana 1998;Walraevens et al, 2000;Pyrzynska et al, 2005;Geerdink et al, 1997;Wells and Yu 2000;Butz, et al, 1994;Di Corcia 1989;Li and Lee 2000;Font et al, 2007;Doble et al, 2007).…”
Section: Modern Extraction Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%