2014
DOI: 10.1007/s13233-014-2050-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biocompatible Ag nanoparticle-embedded poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) derivative films with bacterial adhesion-resistant and antibacterial properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The surface functionalization utilizing second hydrophilic polymers such as polysaccharides (e.g., dextran and hyaluronic acid and) [17,18], poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) [19][20][21][22], and biomembranemimicking zwitterionic polymers [e.g., 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine (MPC) and carboxybetaine methacrylate (CBMA)] [23][24][25] is one such strategy to develop such "protein-resistant" biomaterials. These polymers are incorporated on biomaterial surfaces using a diverse set of surface coating and modification techniques, including physical adsorption, graft polymerization, self-assembled monolayers (SAMs), layer-by-layer assembly, interpenetrating polymer network (IPN), surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP), and conventional free-radical polymerization [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. Among these methods, the free-radical polymerization seems the most common reaction employed in the development of surface-modified hydrogels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface functionalization utilizing second hydrophilic polymers such as polysaccharides (e.g., dextran and hyaluronic acid and) [17,18], poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) [19][20][21][22], and biomembranemimicking zwitterionic polymers [e.g., 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine (MPC) and carboxybetaine methacrylate (CBMA)] [23][24][25] is one such strategy to develop such "protein-resistant" biomaterials. These polymers are incorporated on biomaterial surfaces using a diverse set of surface coating and modification techniques, including physical adsorption, graft polymerization, self-assembled monolayers (SAMs), layer-by-layer assembly, interpenetrating polymer network (IPN), surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP), and conventional free-radical polymerization [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. Among these methods, the free-radical polymerization seems the most common reaction employed in the development of surface-modified hydrogels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This fouling layer would block the surface-tethered bactericidal agents, thereby inactivating bactericidal functionality. , Therefore, a monofunctional bactericidal coating is insufficient for preventing biofilm formation. In other words, to achieve highly effective anti-biofouling surfaces, integration of bactericidal and bacteria-repellency is highly in demand. ,, …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of antifouling materials is of great interest for multiple biomedical and biotechnological applications, including medical implants, contact lenses, biosensors, drug delivery, and catheters . Surface coating and modification methods that utilize antifouling polymers include physical adsorption, layer‐by‐layer (LbL) assembly, self‐assembled monolayers (SAMs), surface‐initiated atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP), interpenetrating polymer network (IPN), and reaction of the specific groups of polymers with the substrate . Polyhydrophilic polymers, including poly(ethyleneglycol) (PEG), polysaccharides, and polyamides, and polyzwitterionic polymers, such as 2‐methacryloyloxylethyl phosphorylcholine (MPC) and carboxybetaine methacrylate (CBMA), have been employed in the development of bio‐antifouling substrates to reduce protein adsorption and biofilm formation .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%