2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10950-012-9289-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A probabilistic approach for the classification of earthquakes as ‘triggered’ or ‘not triggered’

Abstract: The occurrence time of earthquakes can be anticipated or delayed by external phenomena that induce strain energy changes on the faults. 'Anticipated' earthquakes are generally called 'triggered'; however, it can be controversial to label a specific earthquake as such, mostly because of the stochastic nature of earthquake occurrence and of the large uncertainties usually associated to stress modelling. Here we introduce a combined statistical and physical approach to quantify the probability that a given earthq… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4), leads to an increase of triggering probability. The magnitude of the increase of probability scales with the intensity of the Coulomb stress and decreases in time according to the decay rate of aftershocks (Dieterich 1994;Passarelli et al 2013). However, the possibility that a major tectonic event is triggered is mainly controlled by the tectonically pre-loaded stresses (Cesca et al 2013a;Passarelli et al 2013), so that the possibility that an earthquake on the Castrovillari fault is triggered due static stress interaction with seismic events in the Mercure basin cannot be excluded.…”
Section: Focal Mechanisms and Coulomb Stress Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4), leads to an increase of triggering probability. The magnitude of the increase of probability scales with the intensity of the Coulomb stress and decreases in time according to the decay rate of aftershocks (Dieterich 1994;Passarelli et al 2013). However, the possibility that a major tectonic event is triggered is mainly controlled by the tectonically pre-loaded stresses (Cesca et al 2013a;Passarelli et al 2013), so that the possibility that an earthquake on the Castrovillari fault is triggered due static stress interaction with seismic events in the Mercure basin cannot be excluded.…”
Section: Focal Mechanisms and Coulomb Stress Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On day 4.8 from the onset of the seismic swarm, a M l =6.5 event occurred near the propagating tip (Figure ). (see other examples of large dike‐triggered earthquakes by Buck et al [] and Passarelli et al []). After that, the dike stopped propagating and continued inflating and possibly extending vertically, as demonstrated by increased displacements at the GPS stations at Miyakejima, Kozushima, Niijima, and on the Japan mainland [ Ozawa et al , ; Nakada et al , ; Yamaoka et al , ; Hughes , ].…”
Section: Tectonic Setting and Chronology Of The Intrusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1)- (3) are appropriate to calculate the seismicity rate in case of gradual changes of stress; e.g., as the effect of fluid injection in a reservoir . This is different from the original RaS type model concerning a sudden change in stress caused by a large earthquake (Catalli et al, 2008;Dieterich et al, 2000;Toda and Stein, 2003) or an instantaneous dyke intrusion as assumed by Passarelli et al (2013). In both cases, a seismicity dataset is required since the stress changes are calculated based on the focal mechanism of an earthquake.…”
Section: Time-dependent Rate-and-state Model and Link To The Geomechamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A step towards a link between geomechanical numerical reservoir models and tectonic earthquakes is shown by Passarelli et al (2013). They present an approach for how to estimate the probability of whether a tectonic earthquake was triggered by a stress change of a dike intrusion or not.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%