2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10071-007-0111-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Food and token quantity discrimination in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella)

Abstract: Quantity discrimination is adaptive in a variety of ecological contexts and different taxa discriminate stimuli differing in numerousness, both in the wild and in laboratory settings. Quantity discrimination between object arrays has been suggested to be more demanding than between food arrays but, to our knowledge, the same paradigm has never been used to directly compare them. We investigated to what extent capuchin monkeys' relative numerousness judgments (RNJs) with food and token are alike. Tokens are inh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

12
78
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
12
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar phenomenon has been observed previously when the same population of capuchins was tested in two other tasks involving the comparison between a 'real' and a 'symbolic' condition [10,11]. When presented with relative numerousness judgements with food and tokens, capuchins performed better with food than with tokens [9].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…A similar phenomenon has been observed previously when the same population of capuchins was tested in two other tasks involving the comparison between a 'real' and a 'symbolic' condition [10,11]. When presented with relative numerousness judgements with food and tokens, capuchins performed better with food than with tokens [9].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Although this is likely to be correct for symbolic mathematical capacity (Carey 2004), recent evidence from clinical neuropsychology suggests a remarkable degree of independence of mathematical cognition from language grammar in human adults ( Varley et al 2005; see also Butterworth et al 2008). Moreover, numerical competences have recently been demonstrated in a variety of species (for mammalian and bird species, see Hauser et al 2000;Hauser & Carey 2003;Lyon 2003;Judge et al 2005;Pepperberg & Gordon 2005;Beran et al 2006;Cantlon & Brannon 2006a,b, 2007Pepperberg 2006;Addessi et al 2008;Rugani et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence to suggest that animals are able to make these discriminations when given direct comparisons (e.g. [7,8]); however, it is still not clear whether information of this type, i.e. relative salience/value, can be retained over an extended period of time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%