Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
554
0
9

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,207 publications
(563 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
554
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…If one outputs is more important than others, a higher weight should be assigned to it. Marler and Arora (2010) reviewed the applications, conceptual significance and pitfalls of weighting function-based optimal methods, and gave some suggestions to avoid blind use of it.…”
Section: Multi-objective Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If one outputs is more important than others, a higher weight should be assigned to it. Marler and Arora (2010) reviewed the applications, conceptual significance and pitfalls of weighting function-based optimal methods, and gave some suggestions to avoid blind use of it.…”
Section: Multi-objective Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the analysis in [26], the weighted sum method provides a basic and easy-to-use approach that gives an acceptable approximation of one's preference function when the preference information is not too complex. In this model, the solution is a trade-off between energy performance and the investment.…”
Section: The Weighted Sum Methods For Multi-objective Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alas, it is not known whether visualization experts can reliably predict how subtle changes in scatterplot design affect user performance. A weight must be set relative to other weights and to the cost function [41]. In the field of optimization, expert ratings, rankings, or paired comparisons are commonly used for weight selection [41].…”
Section: Calibration Of Weight Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A weight must be set relative to other weights and to the cost function [41]. In the field of optimization, expert ratings, rankings, or paired comparisons are commonly used for weight selection [41]. For these reasons, we opted for an empirical weight acquisition procedure.…”
Section: Calibration Of Weight Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%