1999
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-4661-6_61
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular and Field Analysis of Somaclonal Variation in Transgenic Plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, increasing the number of subculturing cycles during tissue culture may result in genetic variation. It has been previously reported that the use of potential plant growth regulators like TDZ in tissue culture could induce alteration(s) in sensitive regions of the plant genome (Sala et al, 1999). ISSR markers are considered suitable to determine somaclonal variations among plants produced by micropropagation (Joshi and Dhawan, 2007;Leroy et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, increasing the number of subculturing cycles during tissue culture may result in genetic variation. It has been previously reported that the use of potential plant growth regulators like TDZ in tissue culture could induce alteration(s) in sensitive regions of the plant genome (Sala et al, 1999). ISSR markers are considered suitable to determine somaclonal variations among plants produced by micropropagation (Joshi and Dhawan, 2007;Leroy et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensive field testing is essential. Stable inheritance of a transgene in field trials has been reported in transgenic sugarcane previously (Gallo‐Meagher and Irvine, 1996; Arencibia et al, 1999; Sala et al, 1999), as well as in other graminaceous monocotyledons such as barley (Horvath et al, 2001) and rice (Jiang et al, 2000). However, the importance of thorough screening of transgenic plants that are propagated vegetatively was stressed in a paper on transgenic tall fescue (Bettany et al, 1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Underlining the need for field data is the fact that the integrity and stability of the plant genome as a whole may be affected by the tissue culture and transformation process. Genomic change resulting from transgenesis has been documented in various plants including rice (Jiang et al, 2000; Labra et al, 2001), barley (Bregitzer et al, 1998; Choi et al, 2000) and sugarcane (Arencibia et al, 1999, 2000; Sala et al, 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use of synthetic plant growth regulators (PGRs) at suband supra-optimal levels was found to induce somaclonal variations in a number of crops (Martins et al 2004) as because, the presence of PGRs could induce alteration(s) in sensitive regions of the plant genome (Sala et al 1999) which can be attributed to DNA methylation, amplification or the activation of transposable elements (Brar and Jain 1998). It is, thus, necessary to establish the genetic stability of the regenerated plantlets under the influence of strong cytokinin, like TDZ, using molecular markers, viz., random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR), etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%