Radicalization, Extremism, Terrorism

Richards, Julian

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-55203-3_3

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There is also the possibility that multiagency approaches could lead to adverse outcomes (Galloway, 2017 ; Norton, 2018 ). For example, multiagency responses that have poor levels of coordination and communication could lead to cases falling through the cracks where no one agency responds under the misguided assumption that another partner agency is taking the lead (Richards, 2017 ; Smith et al, 1992 ). Ransley ( 2016 ) also raises the possibility of coercion from multiagency responses.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multiagency programs with police as a partner for reducing radicalisation to violence

Mazerolle

Cherney

Eggins

et al. 2021

Campbell Systematic Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Multiagency responses to reduce radicalisation often involve collaborations between police, government, nongovernment, business and/or community organisations. The complexities of radicalisation suggest it is impossible for any single agency to address the problem alone. Police-involved multiagency partnerships may disrupt pathways from radicalisation to violence by addressing multiple risk factors in a coordinated manner. Objectives:1. Synthesise evidence on the effectiveness of police-involved multiagency interventions on radicalisation or multiagency collaboration 2. Qualitatively synthesise information about how the intervention works (mechanisms), intervention context (moderators), implementation factors and economic considerations. Search Methods: Terrorism-related terms were used to search the Global Policing Database, terrorism/counterterrorism websites and repositories, and relevant journals for published and unpublished evaluations conducted 2002-2018. The search was conducted November 2019. Expert consultation, reference harvesting and forward citation searching was conducted November 2020. Selection Criteria: Eligible studies needed to report an intervention where police partnered with at least one other agency and explicitly aimed to address terrorism, violent extremism or radicalisation. Objective 1 eligible outcomes included violent extremism, radicalisation and/or terrorism, and multiagency collaboration. Only impact evaluations using experimental or robust quasi-experimental designs were eligible. Objective 2 placed no limits on outcomes. Studies needed to report an empirical assessment of an eligible intervention and provide data on mechanisms, moderators, implementation or economic considerations. Data Collection and Analysis: The search identified 7384 records. Systematic screening identified 181 studies, of which five were eligible for Objective 1 and 26 for Objective 2.Effectiveness studies could not be meta-analysed, so were summarised and effect size

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multiagency programs with police as a partner for reducing radicalisation to violence

Mazerolle

Cherney

Eggins

et al. 2021

Campbell Systematic Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…There is also the possibility that multiagency approaches could lead to adverse outcomes (Galloway, 2017 ; Norton, 2018 ). For example, multiagency responses that have poor levels of coordination and communication could lead to cases falling through the cracks where no one agency responds under the misguided assumption that another partner agency is taking the lead (Richards, 2017 ; Smith, Laszlo, Ayers, & Smith, 1992 ). Ransley ( 2016 ) also raises the possibility of increased coercion from multiagency responses.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%