2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-60761-817-1_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of Crimean–Congo Hemorrhagic Fever, Hanta, and Sandfly Fever Viruses by Real-Time RT-PCR

Abstract: The development of sensitive and specific nucleic acid diagnostic assays for viral pathogens is essential for proper medical intervention. This chapter describes four fluorescence-based PCR assays to detect the Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever (CCHFV), Andes (ANDV), Hantaan (HANV), and Sandfly Fever Sicilian (SFSV) Viruses. These assays are based on species-specific hydrolysis probes targeting the nucleocapsid protein gene for CCHFV and SFSV and the glycoprotein gene for ANDV and HANV. All four assays were opti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Direct diagnosis of CCHFV infection is based either on virus isolation or on molecular detection of the genome (41)(42)(43)(44)(45). However, the period in which the virus can be detected in patients is rather short.…”
Section: Generation Of Cchf Virus-like Particles Expressing a Reportementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct diagnosis of CCHFV infection is based either on virus isolation or on molecular detection of the genome (41)(42)(43)(44)(45). However, the period in which the virus can be detected in patients is rather short.…”
Section: Generation Of Cchf Virus-like Particles Expressing a Reportementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because of the remarkable genetic variability among CCHFV strains, most current RT-PCRs either fail to detect specific strains or lack sensitivity [18]. A further improvement has been the development of real-time RT-PCRs, which have higher specificity and sensitivity, higher time-effectiveness and lower risk of contamination than conventional RT-PCR [19][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others have previously detected hantavirus by RT-qPCR but to our knowledge, this is the first effort to validate this technique as a diagnostic tool in a large number of patients (Evander et al 2007; Ibrahim et al 2011; Machado and Souza 2013). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%