Family Interaction and Psychopathology 1987
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4899-0840-7_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Systems View of Family Interaction and Psychopathology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0
5

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
47
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we did not have the means or time to conduct home observations. Second, next to behavior, each parent's and child's affect and the emotional context will certainly influence the meaning that both parent and child attach to each other's behavior (Maccoby & Martin, 1983;Steinglass, 1987). Furthermore, we observed some weaknesses in the Nijmegen Parenting Questionnaire.…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…However, we did not have the means or time to conduct home observations. Second, next to behavior, each parent's and child's affect and the emotional context will certainly influence the meaning that both parent and child attach to each other's behavior (Maccoby & Martin, 1983;Steinglass, 1987). Furthermore, we observed some weaknesses in the Nijmegen Parenting Questionnaire.…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The results of our study show a significant effect of a negative escalating verbal communication pattern on poor outcome. In the family communication-based model, communication serves the function of transmitting information and, in its formal aspects, provides the ways in which family members define, control and reinforce the relationships with each other to maintain the constancy of the family's internal environment [40]. It is this second formal aspect of communication that has been identified as related to outcome in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…[38][39][40] Family systems theorists have explained these same processes in terms of circular cybernetic systems with an emphasis on molar-level structural analysis. 41,42 While there are definite differences between these two theoretical approaches, they both share a common emphasis on observable regularities in interpersonal processes. Robin and Foster 43 have integrated concepts from both schools in building a comprehensive behavioural systems theory of family functioning, adding notions of contingency arrangements, social learning principles and cognitive behavioural theory to the analysis of the family as a circular system with a definite structural configuration.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework Underlying Some Therapeutic Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%