2018
DOI: 10.1002/hpm.2625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Barriers and facilitators to implementation of essential health benefits package within primary health care settings in low‐income and middle‐income countries: A systematic review

Abstract: We identified a set of barriers and facilitators that need to be addressed to ensure proper implementation of EHPs within primary health care settings.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature on the benefits package definition shows the importance of involving stakeholders through debate and dialogue to set national priorities in terms of designing its content and the process to perform further adaptation [40]. Although the benefits package was a political and sensitive issue, participants did not shy away from discussing it and suggested that its current definition can no longer survive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature on the benefits package definition shows the importance of involving stakeholders through debate and dialogue to set national priorities in terms of designing its content and the process to perform further adaptation [40]. Although the benefits package was a political and sensitive issue, participants did not shy away from discussing it and suggested that its current definition can no longer survive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ECSP is defined as a collection of health and social services necessary to care for PLWD in the care settings of home, community and institution, which including the type of service and hours of care needed for each type. The guiding principle for the development of the ECSP is to take person-centered care service need as the orientation, universal care coverage on safeguarding vulnerable populations as the focus, to balance the basic services needs for PLWD with affordability, equity, feasibility and sustainability in implementation by national and local governments [10,26,27]. There were three major steps involved in the development process: 1) estimation of perceived needs based on the service use data obtained from the survey; 2) estimation of time needed to provide each type of service; and 3) comparison between perceived needs and actual utilization data to determine which services should be included in the ECSP.…”
Section: Essential Care Service Package (Ecsp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Informed by the Australian model of care and the ESP development for medical care, 80% of the health service needs were selected as the threshold for inclusion of the General Care Service of ECSP [26]. Thus, any service perceived by 80% or more of PLWD as being needed was included in the ECSP, so was any service with actual utilization rate of 60% or more were also included, that is, the basic care services for PLWD with low-level (mild cognitive impairment).…”
Section: Essential Care Service Package (Ecsp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The newly codified concept of "Networks of Care" (NOC) offers a promising option for implementation of UHC. 12 The NOC approach, a style of integrated health delivery, is described in a multi-method scoping study and case studies from six diverse implementation settings. [1][2][3][4][5][6] The articles provide a set of practicable, measurable means to bridge Networks of Care and Universal Health Coverage.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A country may define a costeffective health benefits package through a rigorous, evidence-based priority setting exercise at national level, only to find that there are limited levers to identify and reach those most in need, and to deliver this package in practice. 12 Assessments of the implementation of health benefits packages have noted several key barriers, including lack of communication between policymakers and implementers, lack of coordination with community networks, and ineffective primary health-care service delivery arrangements. 13 The NOC administrative and clinical management model could be applied at subnational level to contribute to all four UHC implementation steps, and is particularly relevant to the fourth step to set up structures to actualize service delivery.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%