2005
DOI: 10.1002/eat.20097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factor Structure of the Eating Disorder Inventory-C

Abstract: When the EDI-C is used, the reliability of the original 11 factors may be low. A modified subscale structure with five factors is proposed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…41 Patients with obesity presented strong negative feeling about their bodies. 42 The present survey showed that age did not demonstrate any impact an the scores on the questionnaire EDI, except that the younger group (30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39) showed significantly higher scores than the middle aged group (40-49) on subscale bulimia on the questionnaire EDI-2. Mclean, Paxton and Wertheim found that in the EDE-Q subscales: the Body Dissatisfaction and disordered eating symptoms were unrelated to age 13 .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…41 Patients with obesity presented strong negative feeling about their bodies. 42 The present survey showed that age did not demonstrate any impact an the scores on the questionnaire EDI, except that the younger group (30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39) showed significantly higher scores than the middle aged group (40-49) on subscale bulimia on the questionnaire EDI-2. Mclean, Paxton and Wertheim found that in the EDE-Q subscales: the Body Dissatisfaction and disordered eating symptoms were unrelated to age 13 .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…But several authors have argued that the original scoring is in fact better [31][32][33] . Shoemaker et al discovered that compared to the transformed scales 0-3, the original 1-6 scoring showed a higher internal consistency 32 (cited by 34 ). For that reason we decided to use the original 1-6 scale.…”
Section: Edi-2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The five dimensions of the EDI-2 item are not surprising 11. The first factor of self-esteem mainly described ineffectiveness (I), social insecurity (SI), and interpersonal distrust (ID).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%