Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Study design inclusion criteria may also lessen the need for subjective judgments on the part of authors, increasing the systematic nature of reviews. There are ongoing debates regarding whether use of study design inclusion criteria are appropriate for systematic reviews and other forms of evidence synthesis [24,25]. However these debates will be resolved, as a general principle it is important in systematic reviews to clearly describe the study inclusion criteria, the approaches taken to rate quality of primary studies, and the study quality ratings themselves, so that readers can judge the merits of a particular systematic review and the recommendations derived from it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Study design inclusion criteria may also lessen the need for subjective judgments on the part of authors, increasing the systematic nature of reviews. There are ongoing debates regarding whether use of study design inclusion criteria are appropriate for systematic reviews and other forms of evidence synthesis [24,25]. However these debates will be resolved, as a general principle it is important in systematic reviews to clearly describe the study inclusion criteria, the approaches taken to rate quality of primary studies, and the study quality ratings themselves, so that readers can judge the merits of a particular systematic review and the recommendations derived from it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…50 Readers must decide for themselves the adequacy of the rationale for conducting the study. 50 Readers must decide for themselves the adequacy of the rationale for conducting the study.…”
Section: Scott and Attiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both questions involve subjective judgement as to what constitutes the threshold of evidence pertinent to each one, as no explicit rules currently exist. 50 Readers must decide for themselves the adequacy of the rationale for conducting the study.…”
Section: Adequate Power To Confirm Small Effects and Differences In Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chalmers, 1993;I. Chalmers, Sackett, & Silagy, 1997;Dickersin & Manheimer, 1998;Oxman, 2001). Since the launch of The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews in 1995, the research syntheses that have been published by this still young organization have been having an encouraging effect on the content of international guidelines and policies in health care.…”
Section: Using Electronic Media To Keep Research Syntheses Up To Datementioning
confidence: 99%