1988
DOI: 10.1001/jama.1988.03410120089033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Quality of Care

Abstract: Before assessment can begin we must decide how quality is to be defined and that depends on whether one assesses only the performance of practitioners or also the contributions of patients and of the health care system; on how broadly health and responsibility for health are defined; on whether the maximally effective or optimally effective care is sought; and on whether individual or social preferences define the optimum. We also need detailed information about the causal linkages among the structural attribu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

11
1,158
0
41

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4,219 publications
(1,210 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
11
1,158
0
41
Order By: Relevance
“…Quality can refer to the technical quality of care to the nontechnical aspect of service delivery such as clients' waiting time and staff attitudes, and to programmatic elements such as policies, infrastructures, access, and management. [11][12][13] In health care and Family Planning Program service, this means offering a range of services that is safe, effective and that satisfy clients' needs and wants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quality can refer to the technical quality of care to the nontechnical aspect of service delivery such as clients' waiting time and staff attitudes, and to programmatic elements such as policies, infrastructures, access, and management. [11][12][13] In health care and Family Planning Program service, this means offering a range of services that is safe, effective and that satisfy clients' needs and wants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons for cancellation of elective surgical cases which may be patient-initiated or hospital-initiated are multifactorial [11] [12]. These reasons can also be assessed using the Donabedian's quality of care framework [13] which was also used by Leslie RJ et al [8] and presents a relationship between Structure, Process and Patient outcomes. The factors may be categorized into (1) structural factors such as, limited operating rooms and full recovery ward; (2) patient factors such as patient not turning up or not adhering to pre-operative instructions; and (3) process factors such as surgery running late and mechanical faults with theatre equipment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study we propose a theoretically-driven approach to study LS adoption. Specifically, we will examine the relationship between state policy and service area factors, hospital characteristics, and hospital LS adoption (20,21), using an adaptation of a well-established framework (Donabedian's three-fold perspective on quality healthcare) (22). Organizational theories provide the scope of hospital structure and process factors that are likely to lead to LS adoption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%