1. The European Convention on Human Rights in context

Harris, David; O’Boyle, Michael; Bates, Edward; Buckley, Carla

doi:10.1093/he/9780198785163.003.0001

Cited by 62 publications

(77 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…204 This is not a requirement for an independent tribunal at the initial stage in every case. 205 In the interests of 'flexibility and efficiency' 206 the ECtHR will allow decisions which affect fundamental rights to be made administratively at first instance, provided that there is 'subsequent control by a judicial body that has full jurisdiction and does provide the guarantees of Article 6(1)'. 207 The case law on this point, however, makes it clear that 'full jurisdiction' requires the existence of an appeal on the merits: a mere review of legality is insufficient.…”

Section: Requirements Imposed By Articlementioning

confidence: 99%

“…207 The case law on this point, however, makes it clear that 'full jurisdiction' requires the existence of an appeal on the merits: a mere review of legality is insufficient. 208 Consequently, judicial review in the narrow sense of domestic law would not be sufficient -for a state blocking system to be compatible with Article 6 a statutory appeal mechanism would have to be established.…”

Section: Requirements Imposed By Articlementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Internet Censorship in the United Kingdom: National Schemes and European Norms

McIntyre¹

2018

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The United Kingdom (UK) has been at the vanguard of online censorship in democracies from the beginning of the modern internet. Since the mid-1990s the government has developed distinctive patterns of regulation – targeting intermediaries, using the bully pulpit to promote ‘voluntary’ self-regulation, and promoting automated censorship tools such as web blocking – which have been influential internationally but raise significant issues of legitimacy, transparency and accountability. This chapter examines this UK experience in light of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and EU law, arguing that in key regards current censorship practices fail to meet European standards.The chapter builds on the existing literature in two main ways. First, it assesses emerging censorship practices in the area of terrorist material and extreme pornography. Second, it considers how recent EU legislation and ECtHR case law might constrain the freedom of the UK government and force a move towards different models of censorship.The chapter starts by outlining the regulatory context. It then takes three case studies – Child Abuse Material (CAM), terrorist material, and pornography/extreme pornography under the Digital Economy Act 2017 – and traces how censorship has evolved from one context to the next. These systems are then evaluated against the standards set by European law and in particular Articles 6 and 10 ECHR, the Open Internet Regulation, and the Directives on Sexual Abuse of Children and on Combating Terrorism.

show abstract

Section: Requirements Imposed By Articlementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Requirements Imposed By Articlementioning

confidence: 99%

Internet Censorship in the United Kingdom: National Schemes and European Norms

McIntyre¹

2018

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…55 Although the Court left open how it envisaged such a tailoring, and any prediction remains uncertain, future international jurisprudence will likely opt for the new approach, 56 especially because the jurisprudence of the ECtHR has been an example for other human rights bodies and its reasoning has been followed throughout the world. 57…”

Section: Iii3 Tailoring Of Human Rightsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Unmanned Military Systems and Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Law

Frau¹

2018

GroJIL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article addresses human rights issues that arise from the use of unmanned military systems in armed conflict. It is assessed when and to what extent human rights law applies in times of armed conflict. The major focus is the question of whether or not human rights law applies extraterritorially. It is argued that it applies to a greater extent to the use of unmanned military systems than might be expected under the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. Hence, a new approach to the concept of ‘jurisdiction’ is submitted. In addition, specific scenarios, in which unmanned military systems are frequently deployed, are measured against the legal framework.

show abstract

“…In the same vein, the rules on jurisdiction of Regulation no. 2201/2003, which are designed in broad terms to realize the interests of the spouses in relation to the needs related to the mobility of persons 188 and consequently provide a plurality of alternative forums, are intended to favor the plaintiff's right to an effective appeal as it with the need to protect the right to private and family life according to ECtHR Babiarz v. Poland case of 10 January 2017 189 .…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Integration and cooperation of International and European Private Law according charter of the fundamental rights of the European Union = Integración y cooperación del Derecho privado internacional y europeo según la carta de los derechos fundamentales de la Unión Europea

Liakopoulos

2019

Cuad. derecho transnac.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The time has come, given the relative maturity of the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union, regarding the peculiarities linked to the protection of fundamental rights in EU system of civil judicial cooperation to dedicate a detailed investigation and in the field of incidence of EU Charter of Fundamental Rights on EU’s legal system, as well as the specific modalities that affects the elaboration and application of the instruments of civil judicial co-operation.Keywords: CFREU, European Union integration, private international law, civil judicial cooperation, protection of fundamental rights.Resumen: Ha llegado el momento, dada la relativa madurez de la jurisprudencia del Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea, en relación con las peculiaridades relacionadas con la protección de los derechos fundamentales en el sistema de cooperación judicial civil de la UE para dedicar una investigación detallada y en el campo de la incidencia. de la Carta de los Derechos Fundamentales de la UE sobre el sistema legal de la UE, así como las modalidades específicas que afectan la elaboración y aplicación de los instrumentos de cooperación judicial civil.Palabras clave: CFREU, integración de la Unión Europea, derecho internacional privado, cooperación judicial civil, protección de los derechos fundamentales.

show abstract

1. The European Convention on Human Rights in context

Cited by 62 publications

References 0 publications

Internet Censorship in the United Kingdom: National Schemes and European Norms

Internet Censorship in the United Kingdom: National Schemes and European Norms

Unmanned Military Systems and Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Law

Integration and cooperation of International and European Private Law according charter of the fundamental rights of the European Union = Integración y cooperación del Derecho privado internacional y europeo según la carta de los derechos fundamentales de la Unión Europea

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About