2016
DOI: 10.1016/s1878-6480(16)30183-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

0582: Discordance between mitral valve area and mean transmitral pressure gradient in mitral stenosis: is mean gradient marker of the severity or parameter of tolerance in severe mitral stenosis?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From the ROC curves cut-offs, we determined that when Left Atrium Area (LAA) was larger than 30 cm2 and left atrium volume (LAV) more than 100ml/m2, the risk of occurrence of an event increased significantly respectively (LAA: 69% vs 10%; p = 0.01; OR = 6.6; 95% CI [1.5-28]) and (LAV: 71.4% vs 39%; p = 0.002; OR = 4; 95% CI [1. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]). We have demonstrated from the ROC (Fig 1) curves cut-offs that it was the same for left atrium deformation parameters, both Peak Atrial Longitudinal Strain (PALS) <25% and Peak Atrial Contraction Strain (PACS) <10 % were predictive of events in a univariate study with the following respective odds ratios (ORs) (PALS: 83% vs 30.4%; p = 0.0001; OR = 11.4; 95% CI ), and (PACS: 90% vs 47%; p = 0.001; OR = 9.8; 95% CI [2.3-41]) (see Table 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…From the ROC curves cut-offs, we determined that when Left Atrium Area (LAA) was larger than 30 cm2 and left atrium volume (LAV) more than 100ml/m2, the risk of occurrence of an event increased significantly respectively (LAA: 69% vs 10%; p = 0.01; OR = 6.6; 95% CI [1.5-28]) and (LAV: 71.4% vs 39%; p = 0.002; OR = 4; 95% CI [1. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]). We have demonstrated from the ROC (Fig 1) curves cut-offs that it was the same for left atrium deformation parameters, both Peak Atrial Longitudinal Strain (PALS) <25% and Peak Atrial Contraction Strain (PACS) <10 % were predictive of events in a univariate study with the following respective odds ratios (ORs) (PALS: 83% vs 30.4%; p = 0.0001; OR = 11.4; 95% CI ), and (PACS: 90% vs 47%; p = 0.001; OR = 9.8; 95% CI [2.3-41]) (see Table 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prvobitno je odabrano 80 pacijenata, ali je samo 53 praćeno, a zatim podeljeno u dve grupe: 30 pacijenata je imalo najmanje jedan od navedenih ishoda, a 23 pacijenta nisu imala nijedan od ishoda u skladu sa glavnim kriterijumima studije. U univarijantnoj analizi i za konvencionalne ehokardiografske parametre utvrdili smo da ako je površina leve pretkomore (LAA) veća od 30 cm 2 i zapremina leve pretkomora (LAV) veća od 100 ml/m 2 , rizik od pojave nekog od ishoda značajno se povećava (LAA: 69% naspram 10%; p = 0,01; OR = 6,6; 95% CI [1,) i (LAV: 71,4% naspram 39%; p = 0,002; OR = 4; 95% CI [1,[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]). Isto, za parametre deformacije leve pretkomore i maksimum longitudinalnog pretkomornog opterećenja (PALS) < 25% i maksimum pretkomornog kontrakcionog opterećenja (PACS) < 10% predviđalo je pojavu nekog od ishoda u univarijantnoj studiji sa sledećim odnosima šansi (OR) (PALS: 83% naspram 30,4%; p = 0,0001; OR = 11,4; 95% CI ) i (PACS: 90 % vs 47%; p = 0,001; OR = 9,8; 95% CI [2,).…”
Section: Sažetakunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation