Highlights d Intracellular PD-L1 binds RNA and regulates the RNA stability of DNA damage genes d PD-L1 competes with the RNA exosome to regulate RNA stability globally d PD-L1 is important for proper DNA damage response and repair d The PD-L1 antibody H1A sensitizes tumors to DNA-damaging therapy

BackgroundIL-1α and IL-6 are associated with the prognosis of a wide range of cancers, but their value in cervical cancer remains controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the expression of IL-1α and IL-6 in cervical cancer and their significance in clinical prognosis.Material/MethodsThe expression of IL-1α and IL-6 in 105 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded cervical cancer tissues and adjacent non-tumor tissues was examined by immunohistochemistry. The results were semi-quantitatively scored and analyzed by chi-square test. Patient overall survival (OS) data was collected by follow-up and analyzed by Kaplan-Meier analysis.ResultsThe expression level of both IL-1α and IL-6 in cervical cancer tissue was higher than in adjacent non-tumor tissues (p<0.05). IL-1α expression was shown to be correlated with tumor size, FIGO histology grade, lymph node metastasis, stromal invasion, and tumor differentiation (p<0.05). IL-6 expression was shown to be correlated with tumor size, FIGO histology grade, and tumor differentiation (p<0.05). Patients with positive expression of IL-1α or IL-6 tended to have much shorter survival times than patients with negative expression. In addition, a multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that IL-1α expression and lymph node metastasis were independent predictors of OS in cervical cancer patients.ConclusionsThe expression of IL-1α was significantly associated with tumor size, FIGO histology grade, lymph node metastasis, stromal invasion, and tumor differentiation. The expression of IL-6 was significantly associated with tumor size, FIGO histology grade, and tumor differentiation. Positive IL-1α and IL-6 expression was significantly correlated with poor prognosis. They may be considered valuable biomarkers for prognosis and potential therapeutic targets for cervical cancer.

Apatinib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor, which selectively targets vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 and has the potential to treat many tumors therapeutically. Cyclic arginylglycylaspartic acid (cRGD)- and polyethylene glycol (PEG)-modified liposomes (cRGD-Lipo-PEG) were constructed to act as a targeted delivery system for the delivery of apatinib to the human colonic cancer cell line, HCT116. These cRGD-modified liposomes specifically recognized integrin α v β 3 and exhibited greater uptake efficiency with respect to delivering liposomes into HCT116 cells when compared to nontargeted liposomes (Lipo-PEG), as well as greater death of tumor cells and apoptosis. The mechanism by which cRGD-Lipo-PEG targets cells was elucidated further with competition assays. To determine the anticancer efficacy in vivo, nude mice were implanted with HCT116 xenografts and treated with apatinib-loaded liposomes or free apatinib intravenously or via intragastric administration. The active and passive targeting of cRGD-Lipo-PEG led to significant tumor treatment targeting ability, better inhibition of tumor growth, and less toxicity when compared with treatments using uncombined apatinib. The results presented strongly support the case for cRGD-Lipo-PEG representing a targeted delivery system for apatinib in the treatment of colonic cancer.

Pancreatic cancer is characterized by aggressive and highly metastatic phenotypes. This disease exhibits a poor patient prognosis and is considered a challenge due to the limited treatment options encountered in clinical practice. Previous studies have shown that ruscogenin, a saponin found in the root of Ophiopogon japonicus, exerts a wide range of biological functions including anticancer activity. In the present study, the effects of ruscogenin were investigated on pancreatic cancer cells and the potential molecular mechanism of this compound was explored. Cell viability was assessed using the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. Cell death was measured by trypan blue staining and by flow cytometry. The number of iron oxide nanoparticles was measured using Prussian blue staining. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) production was assessed using flow cytometry with dihydroethidium staining. Protein expression of the associated genes was assayed by western blotting. Furthermore, in vivo experiments were conducted to confirm the antitumor effects and assay the potential toxicity of ruscogenin in a nude mouse xenograft model. The results indicated that ruscogenin significantly repressed cell viability and induced cell death of pancreatic cancer cells in vitro in a dose-and time-dependent manner. Furthermore, ruscogenin increased the concentration of intracellular ferrous irons and the production of ROS. This effect was inhibited by deferoxamine (DFO). Ruscogenin induced ferroptosis by regulating the levels of transferrin and ferroportin. These two proteins were involved in ruscogenin-induced pancreatic cancer cell death. Finally, in vivo experiments demonstrated the antitumor effect of ruscogenin on pancreatic cancer xenografts in the absence of apparent toxicity. Taken collectively, the data demonstrated that ruscogenin exhibited anticancer effects in pancreatic cancer cells by inducing ferroptosis. The findings suggested that this compound may be further developed as a promising anticancer candidate for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Mounting evidence highlights long non‐coding RNAs (lncRNAs) as crucial regulators in multiple types of biological processes and contributing to tumourigenesis. LINC01133, located in chromosome 1q23.2, was a recently identified novel lncRNA with a length of 1154nt. It was involved in the development of colorectal cancer and non‐small cell lung cancer. However, its clinical relevance, biological functions and potential molecular mechanism in breast cancer are still unclear. In this study, we found that the LINC01133 expression was significantly down‐regulated in breast cancer samples and was associated with progression and poor prognosis of breast cancer. Further experiments demonstrated that overexpression of LINC01133 inhibited invasion and metastasis in breast cancer both in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistic investigations revealed that LINC01133 repressed SOX4 expression by recruiting EZH2 to SOX4 promoter. Moreover, rescue experiments further confirmed that LINC01133 functional acted as an anti‐oncogene, at least partly, via repressing SOX4 in breast cancer. Taken together, these findings imply that LINC01133 could serve as a novel prognostic biomarker and potential therapeutic target for breast cancer.