The brain, as a complex dynamically distributed information processing system, involves the coordination of large-scale brain networks such as neural synchronization and fast brain state transitions, even at rest. However, the neural mechanisms underlying brain states and the impact of dysfunction following brain injury on brain dynamics remain poorly understood. To this end, we proposed a microstate-based method to explore the functional connectivity pattern associated with each microstate class. We capitalized on microstate features from eyes-closed resting-state EEG data to investigate whether microstate dynamics differ between subacute stroke patients (N = 31) and healthy populations (N = 23) and further examined the correlations between microstate features and behaviors. An important finding in this study was that each microstate class was associated with a distinct functional connectivity pattern, and it was highly consistent across different groups (including an independent dataset). Although the connectivity patterns were diminished in stroke patients, the skeleton of the patterns was retained to some extent. Nevertheless, stroke patients showed significant differences in most parameters of microstates A, B, and C compared to healthy controls. Notably, microstate C exhibited an opposite pattern of differences to microstates A and B. On the other hand, there were no significant differences in all microstate parameters for patients with left-sided vs. right-sided stroke, as well as patients before vs. after lower limb training. Moreover, support vector machine (SVM) models were developed using only microstate features and achieved moderate discrimination between patients and controls. Furthermore, significant negative correlations were observed between the microstate-wise functional connectivity and lower limb motor scores. Overall, these results suggest that the changes in microstate dynamics for stroke patients appear to be state-selective, compensatory, and related to brain dysfunction after stroke and subsequent functional reconfiguration. These findings offer new insights into understanding the neural mechanisms of microstates, uncovering stroke-related alterations in brain dynamics, and exploring new treatments for stroke patients.
Effective treatment and accurate long-term prognostication of patients with disorders of consciousness (DOC) remain pivotal clinical issues and challenges in neuroscience. Previous studies have shown that zolpidem produces paradoxical recovery and induces similar change patterns in specific electrophysiological features in some DOC (∼6%). However, whether these specific features are neural markers of responders, and how neural features evolve over time remain unclear. Here, we capitalized on static and dynamic EEG analysis techniques to fully uncover zolpidem-induced alterations in eight patients with DOC and constructed machine-learning models to predict long-term outcomes at the single-subject level. We observed consistent patterns of change across all patients in several static features (e.g., decreased relative theta power and weakened alpha-band functional connectivity) after zolpidem administration, albeit none zolpidem responders. Based on the current evidence, previously published electrophysiological features are not neural markers for zolpidem responders. Moreover, we found that the temporal dynamics of the brain slowed down after zolpidem intake. Brain states before and after zolpidem administration could be completely characterized by the EEG features. Furthermore, long-term outcomes were accurately predicted using connectivity features. Our findings suggest that EEG neural signatures have huge potential to assess consciousness states and predict fine-grained outcomes. In summary, our results extend the understanding of the effects of zolpidem on the brain and open avenues for the application prospect of zolpidem and EEG in patients with DOC.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.