Pandemi corona berdampak terhadap hampir seluruh bidang termasuk ketenagakerjaan. kesulitan keuangan yang dihadapi perusahaan berimplikasi terhadap munculnya tindakan pemutusan hubungan kerja (PHK) sebagai alasan efisiensi maupun alasan force majure. Tulisan ini menyajikan dua masalah pokok. Pertama, apakah pandemi corona dapat dijadikan sebagai alasan pemutusan hubungan kerja pekerja oleh perusahaan? kedua, bagaimana perlindungan hak pekerja yang diputus hubungan kerjannya oleh perusahaan menurut UU Ketenagakerjaan? Melalui kajian secara yuridis normatif, diperoleh penjelasan bahwa pengusaha dapat menggunakan pandemi corona sebagai alasan force majeure untuk melakukan PHK karena: berpengaruh terhadap keuangan dan kewajiban perusahaan kepada pekerja; merupakan peristiwa yang sifatnya tidak terduga; serta corona sebagai bencana nonalam berskala nasional. Selain alasan force majeure, efisiensi juga menjadi alasan untuk melakukan PHK. PHK karena alasan force majeure melahirkan hak bagi pekerja sesuai ketentuan Pasal 164 ayat (1), sedangkan bila PHK karena alasan efisiensi, maka hak pekerja sesuai ketentua Pasal 164 ayat (3) UU Ketenagakerjaan.Kata kunci: pandemi corona, pemutusan hubungan kerja, force majeure, efisiensi
The purpose of this study was to see how the management of pulmonary tuberculosis treatment. This research uses a qualitative approach. The results showed that 1 in 3 tuberculosis patients did not comply with tuberculosis treatment in the working area of the Sukamerindu Public Health Center, Bengkulu City. Factors that support treatment non-compliance are the lack of knowledge of tuberculosis treatment guidelines. In conclusion, patients who do not comply are caused because they feel he is already healed and are lazy to take more medicine at the Sukamerindu Health Center, PMO already understands his duties as a PMO.
Keywords: Compliance with Medication, Drug Giver, PMO, Pulmonary Tuberculosis
Humans as social creatures always work, either endeavored alone or work with others in meeting their needs, which then gave birth to work relationships. The working relationship in the journey does not always run harmoniously but there are often disputes that sometimes end with the termination of employment (PHK), as happened in the Supreme Court Decree No: 788k/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2018, where the company laid off workers against and provide compensation for layoffs based on collective agreements and are not guided by the provisions of layoffs in Law No. 13 concerning Manpower.The method of approach used is normative juridical, with research specifications analytical descriptive. The results showed that the joint agreement applied by the Supreme Court Judge as a legal basis in resolving cases, defects an objective requirement that is violating the halal causal conditions, because it regulates layoff compensation whose value is not under the provisions of Article 156 paragraph (1), (2), (3) and (4) the Manpower Act, thus violating the legal conditions of the agreement in Article 1320 of the Civil Code, therefore the agreement is invalid and has no legal force. Besides, the work period of workers with companies based on PKWT should legally change to PKWTT as stipulated in Article 59 paragraph (7) of the Manpower Act.Keywords: Compensation, Work termination, Joint Agreements.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.