No abstract

Salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) is an uncommon, aggressive malignant neoplasm histologically resembling high-grade mammary ductal carcinoma. SDC can arise de novo or ex pleomorphic adenoma. To clarify the correlation of biomarker immunoprofile with clinicopathological findings and clinical outcome of SDC, we conducted immunohistochemistry for EGFR, HER2, HER3, AR, CK5/6, p53, and Ki-67, along with HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization in 151 SDCs. SDCs ex pleomorphic adenoma more commonly overexpressed EGFR, HER2, HER3, and Ki-67 than de novo SDCs (P = 0.015, < 0.001, 0.045, and 0.02, respectively). In multivariate analysis, AR− and CK5/6+ were associated with shorter progression-free survival (P = 0.027 and 0.004, respectively). Moreover, patients with p53-extreme negative/positive demonstrated poorer overall survival (P = 0.007). On assessing the revised classification by the combination of biomarker expression, the percentages of each subtype were as follows: ‘apocrine A’ (AR+/HER2−/Ki-67-low) (24%), ‘apocrine B’ (AR+/HER2−/Ki-67-high) (18%), ‘apocrine HER2’ (AR+/HER2+) (35%), ‘HER2-enriched’ (AR−/HER2+) (12%), and ‘double negative’ (AR−/HER2−) (11%). ‘Double negative’ was further subclassified into ‘basal-like’ (EGFR and/or CK5/6+) (7%) and ‘unclassified’ (3%). Consequently, patients with ‘apocrine A’ showed a better progression-free survival than those with any other subtypes. Our revised immunoprofiling classification was valuable for predicting the survival and might be useful in personalized therapy for patients with SDC.

BackgroundAmong salivary gland malignancies, the prognosis of salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) is assumed to be the poorest. However, because of its low incidence, reliable survival estimates and prognostic factors based on a large number of patients remain to be elucidated, thereby making it impossible to standardize the optimal treatment for SDC.MethodsWe performed this multi-institutional, retrospective analysis by collecting the clinical information of 141 patients with SDC without distant metastasis who underwent curative surgery as the initial treatment to elucidate overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) along with their prognostic factors.ResultsThe 3-year OS and DFS rates were 70.5 and 38.2 %, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that age ≥65 years (p < 0.001) and N1 and N2 (p = 0.047 and <0.001, respectively) were independent prognostic factors for OS, whereas the primary site of the minor salivary and sublingual gland (p < 0.001) and N2 (p < 0.001) were those for DFS. The most common treatment failure was distant metastasis (55 patients, 39.0 %). For early parotid SDC, neither total parotidectomy in the patients with early T stage nor nerve resection in the patients without facial nerve palsy showed survival benefits.ConclusionsAdvanced N stage independently affects both OS and DFS. Partial parotidectomy with facial nerve preservation could be a less invasive standard surgical procedure for parotid gland SDC in the early T stage without facial nerve palsy. Effective systemic therapy is imperative to improve DFS of SDC.

No abstract

Thyroid papillary carcinoma is the most common endocrine neoplasm and generally carries a favorable prognosis. However, a small subset of papillary carcinomas transforms into anaplastic carcinoma, an undifferentiated cancer with a dismal prognosis. Recent studies using next-generation sequencing revealed the genomic landscape of papillary carcinoma and anaplastic carcinoma. However, risk factors for anaplastic transformation in papillary carcinoma remain obscure. In the present study, we investigated molecular alterations of papillary carcinoma and anaplastic carcinoma components in 27 tumors in which anaplastic carcinoma coexisted with antecedent papillary carcinoma. We conducted direct sequencing for BRAF, TERT promoter and PIK3CA, and immunohistochemistry for p53, TTF-1 and subunits of the SWI/SNF complex (ARID1A, ARID1B, ATRX, SMARCA2, SMARCA4, SMARCB1, and PBRM1). BRAF and TERT promoter mutated at the rate of 90% and 95%, respectively, and these mutational statuses were almost identical between the papillary carcinoma and anaplastic carcinoma components. PIK3CA mutation was positive in 33% of our samples with a heterogeneous mutation pattern of the papillary carcinoma and anaplastic carcinoma components. Aberrant expression of p53 and loss of TTF-1 were present in 63 and 59%, respectively, and these two alterations were confined to the anaplastic carcinoma components. There was a loss of the SWI/SNF complex in a subset of the tumors with a heterogeneous pattern of the papillary carcinoma and anaplastic carcinoma components: SMARCA4 in 4% and PBRM1 in 4%. In a multivariate comparison between the antecedent papillary carcinoma components and control papillary carcinomas without anaplastic transformation, TERT promoter mutation was independently associated with anaplastic transformation. Collectively, papillary carcinoma-derived anaplastic carcinomas are characterized by BRAF and TERT promoter mutations, and these mutations occur prior to anaplastic transformation. Alterations of PIK3CA and the SWI/SNF complex are relatively rare and temporally heterogeneous. Of note, a papillary carcinoma harboring TERT promoter mutation is at higher risk for anaplastic transformation.