Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (pancreatic NETs), is an important cause of cancer‐related death worldwide. No study has rigorously explored the impact of ethnicity on pancreatic NETs. We aimed to demonstrate the relationship between ethnicity and the survival of patients with pancreatic NETs. We used the SEER database to identify patients with pancreatic NETs from 2004 to 2013. Kaplan–Meier methods and Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the impact of race on survival in pancreatic NETs patients. A total of 3850 patients were included: 3357 Non‐Blacks, 493 Blacks. We stratified races as “Black” and “White/Other.” Blacks were more likely to be diagnosed with later stages of tumors (P = 0.021). As for the treatment, the access to surgery seemed to be more limited in Blacks than non‐Black patients (P = 0.012). Compared with non‐Black patients, Black patients have worse overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.00–1.37, P = 0.046) and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors specific survival (PNSS) (HR = 1.22, 95% CI: 1.01–1.48, P = 0.044). Multivariate Cox analysis identified that disease extension at the time of diagnosis and surgical status contributed to the ethnical survival disparity. Black patients whose stages at diagnosis were localized had significantly worse OS (HR = 2.09, 95% CI: 1.18–3.71, P = 0.011) and PNSS (HR = 3.79, 95% CI: 1.62–8.82, P = 0.002). As for the patients who did not receive surgery, Blacks also have a worse OS (HR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.00–1.41, P = 0.045). The Black patients had both worse OS and PNSS compared to non‐Black patients. The restricted utilization of surgery, and the advanced disease extension at the time of diagnosis are the possible contributors to poorer survival of Blacks with pancreatic NETs.

Key Points Question What are the associations of cancer stage at time of diagnosis, treatment, and marital status with cancer-specific survival? Findings This cohort study of 1.7 million adults with cancer found that stage at diagnosis mediated the association of marriage with cancer-specific survival in breast, colorectal, and endometrial cancers as well as melanoma; receiving surgery mediated the association in lung, pancreatic, and prostate cancers; and receiving chemotherapy mediated the association in lung and pancreatic cancers. Meaning These findings suggest that promoting the early diagnosis of breast, colorectal, and endometrial cancers and melanoma and providing definitive treatment for lung, pancreatic, and prostate cancers could improve cancer-specific survival among unmarried patients with cancer.

ObjectivesTo evaluate the extent to which marriage influences cancer-specific survival (CSS) by influencing the insurance status among patients with common solid cancers and the feasibility of reducing the survival gap caused by marriage by increasing private insurance coverage for unmarried patients.SettingA retrospective cohort study with patients retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results programme.ParticipantsPatients with nine common solid cancers diagnosed between 2007 and 2016 were included. Patients were excluded if their marital status, insurance status, socioeconomical status, stage or cause of death was unavailable, if survival time was less than 1 month, or if they were younger than 18 years at the time of diagnosis.Primary and secondary outcome measuresThe primary outcome was CSS, which was compared between married and unmarried individuals. Mediation analyses were conducted to determine the contribution of insurance status to the association between marriage and CSS.ResultsMarried patients had better CSS than those unmarried (time ratio 1.778; 95% CI 1.758 to 1.797). Private health insurance was a key factor mediating the association between marital status and CSS (proportion mediated (PM), 17%; 95% CI 17% to 17.1%). The PM ranges from 10.7% in prostate cancer to 20% in kidney cancer. The contribution of private insurance to the association between marital status and CSS was greater among women than among men (PM 18.5% vs 16.7%). The mediating effect of private insurance was the greatest for the comparison between married and separated individuals (PM 25.6%; 95% CI 25.3% to 25.8%) and smallest for the comparison between married and widowed individuals (PM 11.0%; 95% CI 10.9% to 11.1%).Conclusions17% of the marital disparities in CSS are mediated by private insurance coverage. Increasing private insurance coverage for unmarried patients may reduce the survival gap related to marital status and sex. However, it is unclear whether better publicly funded insurance would have the same effect.