Sildenafil, a selective inhibitor of phosphodiesterase type 5, induces powerful protection against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury through activation of cGMP-dependent protein kinase (PKG). We further hypothesized that PKG-dependent activation of survival kinase ERK may play a causative role in sildenafil-induced cardioprotection via induction of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS)/inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and Bcl-2. Our results show that acute intracoronary infusion of sildenafil in Langendorff isolated mouse hearts before global ischemia-reperfusion significantly reduced myocardial infarct size (from 29.4 +/- 2.4% to 15.9 +/- 3.0%; P < 0.05). Cotreatment with ERK inhibitor PD98059 abrogated sildenafil-induced protection (31.8 +/- 4.4%). To further evaluate the role of ERK in delayed cardioprotection, mice were treated with sildenafil (ip) 24 h before global ischemia-reperfusion. PD98059 was administered (ip) 30 min before sildenafil treatment. Infarct size was reduced from 27.6 +/- 3.3% in controls to 7.1 +/- 1.5% in sildenafil-treated mice (P < 0.05). The delayed protective effect of sildenafil was also abolished by PD98059 (22.5 +/- 2.3%). Western blots revealed that sildenafil significantly increased phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and GSK-3beta and induced iNOS, eNOS, Bcl-2, and PKG activity in the heart 24 h after treatment. PD98059 inhibited the enhanced expression of iNOS, eNOS, and Bcl-2 and the phosphorylation of GSK-3beta. PD98059 had no effect on the sildenafil-induced activation of PKG. We conclude that these studies provide first direct evidence that PKG-dependent ERK phosphorylation is indispensable for the induction of eNOS/iNOS and Bcl-2 and the resulting cardioprotection by sildenafil.
Limited-field RT is associated with less lymphopenia after RT plus temozolomide and does not adversely affect PFS or OS. Brain V25 Gy is confirmed as an important dosimetric predictor for ASL.
Background: Primary gliosarcoma is a rare malignant brain tumor with dismal prognosis. Previous reports are limited to case reports and small retrospective case series. Objective: To evaluate treatment and survival outcomes in a large cohort of primary gliosarcoma patients treated in the United States. Results: 1622 patients met the inclusion criterion. Median age was 63 years. The 3-year OS rate for the entire cohort was 11.9%. Patients aged 18 to 60 years were significantly more likely to receive trimodality therapy (defined as the use of surgery, radiotherapy [RT] and chemotherapy [CT]) than patients older than 60 (68.1% vs. 56.7%, p < 0.001). The utilization of trimodality therapy significantly increased during the study period (57.5% in 2004-2008 vs. 65.1% in 2009-2013; p = 0.002). On multivariate Cox regression analysis, GTR, surgery followed by RT and the use of trimodality therapy were associated with longer OS, while older age, Charlson-Deyo score ≥ 1 and multi-focal tumor were associated with shorter OS. The use of trimodality therapy was consistently associated with longer OS in subgroup analyses based on age and extent of resection. Materials and Methods: The National Cancer Database was used to identify all primary gliosarcoma patients aged 18 to 90 years who were diagnosed between 2004 and 2013. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated by Kaplan-Meir analysis, univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. Conclusions: The use of trimodality therapy significantly increased during the study period and was associated with improved outcomes regardless of age and extent of resection.
Radiation therapy (RT) is a curative treatment modality for localized prostate cancer. Over the past two decades, advances in technology and imaging have considerably changed RT in prostate cancer treatment. Treatment has evolved from 2-dimensional (2D) planning using X-ray fields based on pelvic bony landmarks to 3-dimensional (3D) conformal RT (CRT) which uses computed tomography (CT) based planning. Despite improvements with 3D-CRT, dose distributions often remained suboptimal with portions of the rectum and bladder receiving unacceptably high doses. In more recent years, intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has become the standard of care to deliver external beam RT. IMRT uses multiple radiation beams of different shapes and intensities delivered from a wide range of angles to ‘paint’ the radiation dose onto the tumor. IMRT allows for a higher dose of radiation to be delivered to the prostate while reducing dose to surrounding organs. Multiple clinical trials have demonstrated improved cancer outcomes with dose escalation, but toxicities using 3D-CRT and escalated doses have been problematic. IMRT is a method to deliver dose escalated RT with more conformal dose distributions than 3D-CRT and has been associated with improved toxicity profiles. IMRT also appears to be the safest method to deliver hypofractionated RT and pelvic lymph node radiation. The purpose of this review is to summarize the technical aspects of IMRT planning and delivery, and to review the literature supporting the use of IMRT for prostate cancer.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.