The collision rate of monodisperse solid particles in a turbulent gas is governed by a wide range of scales of motion in the flow. Recent studies have shown that large-scale energetic eddies are the dominant factor contributing to the relative velocity between two colliding particles (the turbulent transport effect), whereas small-scale dissipative eddies can enhance the collision rate significantly by inducing local non-uniform particle distribution (the accumulation effect). The turbulent transport effect is most noticeable when the particle inertial response time τp is of the order of the flow integral timescale and the accumulation effect is most pronounced when τp is comparable to the flow Kolmogorov time.We study these two contributions separately through direct numerical simulations. The two effects are quantified carefully with a numerical procedure that is independent of the computation of average collision rate. This facilitates the study of not only the statistical description of the collision kernel, but also the relative contributions and modelling of the two physical effects. Simulations at several flow Reynolds numbers were performed to suggest a model for the accumulation effect. The data show that the accumulation effect scales linearly with flow Taylor microscale Reynolds number Rλ, while the theory for fully developed turbulence indicates that the maximum level of the turbulent transport effect scales with R1/2λ. Finally, an integrated model has been developed to predict the collision rate at arbitrary flow Reynolds numbers and particle inertia.
The House Observations of Microbial and Environmental Chemistry (HOMEChem) study was a large-scale collaborative experimental investigation probing indoor air composition and chemistry.
[1] A comprehensive suite of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) was measured at the semirural Boulder Atmospheric Observatory (BAO) in northeast Colorado during the Nitrogen, Aerosol Composition, and Halogens on a Tall Tower (NACHTT) campaign during the winter of 2011. A signature of elevated nonmethane hydrocarbon (NMHC) mixing ratios was observed throughout the campaign. The C 2 -C 5 alkane mixing ratios were an order of magnitude greater than the regional background. Light alkane mixing ratios were similar to those at urban sites impacted by petrochemical industry emissions with ethane and propane reaching maximums of over 100 ppbv. The mean (± standard deviation) calculated total OH reactivity (7.0 ± 5.0 s À1 ) was also similar to urban sites. Analysis of VOC wind direction dependence, emission ratios with tracer compounds, and vertical profiles up to 250 m implicated regional natural gas production activities as the source of the elevated VOCs to the northeast of BAO and urban combustion emissions as the major VOC source to the south of BAO. Elevated acetonitrile and dimethyl sulfide mixing ratios were also associated with natural gas emissions. Fluxes of natural gas associated NMHCs were determined to estimate regional emission rates which ranged from 40 ± 14 Gg yr À1 for propane to 0.03 ± 0.01 Gg yr À1 for n-nonane. These emissions have the potential to impact downwind air quality as natural gas associated NMHCs comprised ≈24% of the calculated OH reactivity. The measurements described here provide a baseline for determining the efficacy of future policies designed to control emissions from natural gas production activities.Citation: Swarthout, R. F., R. S. Russo, Y. Zhou, A. H. Hart, and B. C. Sive (2013), Volatile organic compound distributions during the NACHTT campaign at the Boulder Atmospheric Observatory: Influence of urban and natural gas sources,
[1] Heterogeneous N 2 O 5 uptake onto aerosol is the primary nocturnal path for removal of NO x (= NO + NO 2 ) from the atmosphere and can also result in halogen activation through production of ClNO 2 . The N 2 O 5 uptake coefficient has been the subject of numerous laboratory studies; however, only a few studies have determined the uptake coefficient from ambient measurements, and none has been focused on winter conditions, when the portion of NO x removed by N 2 O 5 uptake is the largest. In this work, N 2 O 5 uptake coefficients are determined from ambient wintertime measurements of N 2 O 5 and related species at the Boulder Atmospheric Observatory in Weld County, CO, a location that is highly impacted by urban pollution from Denver, as well as emissions from agricultural activities and oil and gas extraction. A box model is used to analyze the nocturnal nitrate radical chemistry and predict the N 2 O 5 concentration. The uptake coefficient in the model is iterated until the predicted N 2 O 5 concentration matches the measured concentration. The results suggest that during winter, the most important influence that might suppress N 2 O 5 uptake is aerosol nitrate but that this effect does not suppress uptake coefficients enough to limit the rate of NO x loss through N 2 O 5 hydrolysis. N 2 O 5 hydrolysis was found to dominate the nocturnal chemistry during this study consuming~80% of nocturnal gas phase nitrate radical production. Typically, less than 15% of the total nitrate radical production remained in the form of nocturnal species at sunrise when they are photolyzed and reform NO 2 . , et al. (2013), N 2 O 5 uptake coefficients and nocturnal NO 2 removal rates determined from ambient wintertime measurements, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 118,[9331][9332][9333][9334][9335][9336][9337][9338][9339][9340][9341][9342][9343][9344][9345][9346][9347][9348][9349][9350]
We study finite-inertia effects on the collision rate of bidisperse heavy particles in a turbulent gas, using direct numerical simulations and kinematic descriptions. As shown previously for a monodisperse system (Sundaram & Collins 1997; Wang, Wexler & Zhou 2000), a statistical mechanical description of the average collision kernel consists of two parts, namely a description of the relative velocity between two colliding particles (the turbulent transport effect) and of the non-uniform particle distribution due to dynamic interaction of particles with coherent vortex structures (the accumulation effect). We first show that this description remains valid and accurate for a bidisperse system involving two groups of particles of inertial response time τp1 and τp2, respectively. Numerical results for the turbulent transport effect and the accumulation effect have been obtained as a function of τp1 and τp2. Interestingly, the accumulation effect in a bidisperse system is bounded above by that of a monodisperse system. An explanation for this observation is given, in terms of the correlation between concentration fields of the two size groups. Simulations show that particles from two size groups were found in different regions of a vortex, thus reducing the net accumulation effect in a bidisperse system. The turbulent transport effect, on the other hand, is bounded below by the level in a monodisperse system, due to a differential inertia effect. The above observations imply that the size polydispersity enhances the turbulent transport effect but weakens the accumulation effect, relative to a monodisperse system.A simple eddy–particle interaction (EPI) model was developed and shown to give a reasonable prediction of the collision kernel, except for a small parametric region where both τp1 and τp2 are on the order of the ow Kolmogorov time τk and thus the accumulation effect must be included. A more accurate model incorporating both the turbulent transport effect and the accumulation effect has also been developed. The model would provide an upper bound on the collision rates for a non-dilute bidisperse system, since turbulence modulation and particle-particle interactions are not considered in this model.Finally, some consideration is given to the effect of nonlinear drag on the collision kernel. The results show that the drag nonlinearity can increase the collision kernel slightly (less than 10%) at large particle inertia.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.