No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Onboard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guided radiotherapy is now clinically available in nine centers in the world. This technology has facilitated the clinical implementation of online adaptive radiotherapy (OART), or the ability to alter the daily treatment plan based on tumor and anatomical changes in real-time while the patient is on the treatment table. However, due to the time sensitive nature of OART, implementation in a large and busy clinic has many potential obstacles as well as patient-related safety considerations. In this work, we have described the implementation of this new process of care in the Department of Radiation Oncology at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA). We describe the rationale, the initial challenges such as treatment time considerations, technical issues during the process of re-contouring, re-optimization, quality assurance, as well as our current solutions to overcome these challenges. In addition, we describe the implementation of a coverage system with a physician of the day as well as online planners (physicists or dosimetrists) to oversee each OART treatment with patient-specific ‘hand-off’ directives from the patient’s treating physician. The purpose of this effort is to streamline the process without compromising treatment quality and patient safety. As more MRI-guided radiotherapy programs come online, we hope that our experience can facilitate successful adoption of OART in a way that maximally benefits the patient.

Purpose: To demonstrate the preliminary feasibility of a longitudinal diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) strategy for assessing patient response to radiotherapy at 0.35 T using an MRI-guided radiotherapy system (ViewRay). Methods: Six patients (three head and neck cancer, three sarcoma) who underwent fractionated radiotherapy were enrolled in this study. A 2D multislice spin echo single-shot echo planar imaging diffusion pulse sequence was implemented on the ViewRay system and tested in phantom studies. The same pulse sequence was used to acquire longitudinal diffusion data (every 2-5 fractions) on the six patients throughout the entire course of radiotherapy. The reproducibility of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements was assessed using reference regions and the temporal variations of the tumor ADC values were evaluated. Results: In diffusion phantom studies, the ADC values measured on the ViewRay system matched well with reference ADC values with <5% error for a range of ground truth diffusion coefficients of 0.4-1.1 × 10 −3 mm 2 /s. The remote reference regions (i.e., brainstem in head and neck patients) had consistent ADC values throughout the therapy for all three head and neck patients, indicating acceptable reproducibility of the diffusion imaging sequence. The tumor ADC values changed throughout therapy, with the change differing between patients, ranging from a 40% drop in ADC within the first week of therapy to gradually increasing throughout therapy. For larger tumors, intratumoral heterogeneity was observed. For one sarcoma patient, postradiotherapy biopsy showed less than 10% necrosis score, which correlated with the observed 40% decrease in ADC from the fifth fraction to the eighth treatment fraction.Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrated that longitudinal diffusion MRI is feasible using the 0.35 T ViewRay MRI. Larger patient cohort studies are warranted to correlate the longitudinal diffusion measurements to patient outcomes. Such an approach may enable response-guided adaptive radiotherapy. C