OBJECTIVES: Airway pressure release ventilation is a ventilatory mode characterized by a mandatory inverse inspiratory:expiratory ratio with a very short expiratory phase, aimed to avoid derecruitment and allow spontaneous breathing. Recent basic and clinical evidence suggests that this mode could be associated with improved outcomes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes between airway pressure release ventilation and traditional ventilation targeting low tidal volume, in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019. DESIGN: Single-center randomized controlled trial. SETTING: ICU of a Mexican referral center dedicated to care of patients with confirmed diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019. PATIENTS: Ninety adult intubated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome associated with severe coronavirus disease 2019. INTERVENTIONS: Within 48 hours after intubation, patients were randomized to either receive ventilatory management with airway pressure release ventilation or continue low tidal volume ventilation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Forty-five patients in airway pressure release ventilation group and 45 in the low tidal volume group were included. Ventilator-free days were 3.7 (0–15) and 5.2 (0–19) in the airway pressure release ventilation and low tidal volume groups, respectively ( p = 0.28). During the first 7 days, patients in airway pressure release ventilation had a higher Pa o 2 /F io 2 (mean difference, 26 [95%CI, 13–38]; p < 0.001) and static compliance (mean difference, 3.7 mL/cm H 2 O [95% CI, 0.2–7.2]; p = 0.03), higher mean airway pressure (mean difference, 3.1 cm H 2 O [95% CI, 2.1–4.1]; p < 0.001), and higher tidal volume (mean difference, 0.76 mL/kg/predicted body weight [95% CI, 0.5–1.0]; p < 0.001). More patients in airway pressure release ventilation had transient severe hypercapnia, defined as an elevation of P co 2 at greater than or equal to 55 along with a pH less than 7.15 (42% vs 15%; p = 0.009); other outcomes were similar. Overall mortality was 69%, with no difference between the groups (78% in airway pressure release ventilation vs 60% in low tidal volume; p = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, when compared with low tidal volume, airway pressure release ventilation was not associated with more ventilator-free days or improvement in other relevant outcomes in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019.

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) progression is closely related to oxidative stress (OS). The study objective was to determine the oxidant and antioxidant status in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). An analytical cross-sectional study from the PD program was carried out with 62 patients, 22 with and 40 without DM. Lipoperoxides (LPO) levels in patients with DM, 3.74 ± 1.09 mM/L, and without DM, 3.87 ± 0.84 mM/L were found to increase compared to healthy controls (HC) 3.05 ± 0.58 mM/L (p = 0.006). The levels of the oxidative DNA damage marker (8-OH-dG) were found to be significantly increased in patients with DM, 1.71 ng/mL (0.19–71.92) and without DM, 1.05 ng/mL (0.16–68.80) front to 0.15 ng/mL (0.15–0.1624) of HC (p = 0.001). The antioxidant enzyme superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity was found to be significantly increased in patients with DM, 0.37 ± 0.15 U/mL, and without DM, 0.37 ± 0.17 compared to HC, 0.23 ± 0.05 U/mL (p = 0.038). The activity of the enzyme glutathione peroxidase (GPx) showed a significant increase (p < 0.001) in patients with DM, 3.56 ± 2.18 nmol/min/mL, and without DM, 3.28 ± 1.46 nmol/min/mL, contrary to the activity obtained in HC, 1.55 ± 0.34 nmol/min/mL. In conclusion, we found an imbalance of oxidative status in patients undergoing PD with and without DM through the significant increase in LPO oxidants and the marker of oxidative damage in DNA. The activity of the antioxidant enzymes SOD and GPx were significantly increased in patients with and without DM undergoing PD, possibly in an attempt to compensate for the deregulation of oxidants. Antioxidant enzymes could be promising therapeutic strategies as a complement to the management of chronic kidney diseases.

No abstract