Lithium-ion batteries have had a profound impact on our daily life, but inherent limitations make it difficult for Li-ion chemistries to meet the growing demands for portable electronics, electric vehicles and grid-scale energy storage. Therefore, chemistries beyond Li-ion are currently being investigated and need to be made viable for commercial applications. The use of metallic Li is one of the most favoured choices for next-generation Li batteries, especially Li-S and Li-air systems. After falling into oblivion for several decades because of safety concerns, metallic Li is now ready for a revival, thanks to the development of investigative tools and nanotechnology-based solutions. In this Review, we first summarize the current understanding on Li anodes, then highlight the recent key progress in materials design and advanced characterization techniques, and finally discuss the opportunities and possible directions for future development of Li anodes in applications.

No abstract

Metallic lithium is a promising anode candidate for future high-energy-density lithium batteries. It is a light-weight material, and has the highest theoretical capacity (3,860 mAh g(-1)) and the lowest electrochemical potential of all candidates. There are, however, at least three major hurdles before lithium metal anodes can become a viable technology: uneven and dendritic lithium deposition, unstable solid electrolyte interphase and almost infinite relative dimension change during cycling. Previous research has tackled the first two issues, but the last is still mostly unsolved. Here we report a composite lithium metal anode that exhibits low dimension variation (∼20%) during cycling and good mechanical flexibility. The anode is composed of 7 wt% 'lithiophilic' layered reduced graphene oxide with nanoscale gaps that can host metallic lithium. The anode retains up to ∼3,390 mAh g(-1) of capacity, exhibits low overpotential (∼80 mV at 3 mA cm(-2)) and a flat voltage profile in a carbonate electrolyte. A full-cell battery with a LiCoO2 cathode shows good rate capability and flat voltage profiles.

Polysulfide binding and trapping to prevent dissolution into the electrolyte by a variety of materials has been well studied in Li−S batteries. Here we discover that some of those materials can play an important role as an activation catalyst to facilitate oxidation of the discharge product, Li 2 S, back to the charge product, sulfur. Combining theoretical calculations and experimental design, we select a series of metal sulfides as a model system to identify the key parameters in determining the energy barrier for Li 2 S oxidation and polysulfide adsorption. We demonstrate that the Li 2 S decomposition energy barrier is associated with the binding between isolated Li ions and the sulfur in sulfides; this is the main reason that sulfide materials can induce lower overpotential compared with commonly used carbon materials. Fundamental understanding of this reaction process is a crucial step toward rational design and screening of materials to achieve high reversible capacity and long cycle life in Li−S batteries. T he ever-increasing demand for energy storage devices with high energy density, low material cost, and long cycle life has driven the development of new battery systems beyond the currently dominant lithium ion batteries (LIBs) (1). Among alternative battery chemistries, lithium−sulfur (Li−S) batteries have attracted remarkable attention due to their high theoretical energy density of 2,600 watt hours per kilogram, 5 times higher than those of state-of-the-art LIBs (2-4). In addition, sulfur, as a byproduct of the petroleum refining process, is naturally abundant, inexpensive, and environmentally friendly (5). However, the practical application of Li−S batteries is still plagued with numerous challenges. For example, the insulating nature of sulfur and discharge products Li 2 S/Li 2 S 2 leads to low active material utilization. In addition, the easy dissolution of lithium polysulfides (LiPSs) into the electrolyte causes LiPSs shuttling between cathode and anode and uncontrollable deposition of sulfide species on the lithium metal anode, inducing fast capacity fading and low coulombic efficiency (2, 6).Tremendous efforts have been taken to circumvent these concerns, with the nanostructuring of electrodes as one of the most effective approaches to overcoming the issues facing highcapacity electrode materials (2, 7). For example, the integration of nanostructured carbon materials with sulfur is one of the primary strategies for improving the electrical conductivity of the composites and suppression of polysulfide shuttling through physical confinement (8-14). However, it was first recognized by Zheng et al. (11) that the weak interaction between nonpolar carbon-based materials and polar LiPSs/Li 2 S species leads to weak confinement and easy detachment of LiPSs from the carbon surface, with further diffusion into the electrolyte causing capacity decay and poor rate performance. Therefore, the introduction of heteroatoms into carbonaceous materials (such as nitrogen, oxygen, boron, phosphorous, sulfur, or ...

No abstract