Background: Papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) has a strong propensity to metastasize to the cervical lymph nodes. Little was known currently about whether tumor's location would influence the risk of lymph node metastasis in PTC. Methods:The study enrolled PTC patients who underwent primary surgical therapy in our center for small unifocal tumor. The tumor's location was evaluated by ultrasound in three axes, three planes and 3D space. Logistic univariate and multivariate analysis were applied to explore the association between tumors' location and the risk of lymph node metastasis in PTC. Different localization methods of thyroid tumors were evaluated using ROC curve.Results: Totally 1,266 PTC patients were enrolled in this study. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that gender, age, tumor size and tumor's location (in longitudinal axis, longitudinal sagittal plane, longitudinal coronal plane, sagittal coronal plane and 3D space) was associated with central lymph node dissection (CLND); gender, tumor size and tumor's location (in longitudinal axis, coronal axis, longitudinal sagittal plane, longitudinal coronal plane, sagittal coronal plane and 3D space) was related with lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) (P<0.05). In the ROC curve analysis, the 3D location showed the highest predictive value of lymph node metastasis (C-statistics: 0.724 for CLNM; 0.763 for LLNM). The middle posterior lateral (OR=2.575, P=0.028), inferior anterior central (OR=2.829, P=0.016), inferior posterior lateral (OR=2.759, P=0.039) and isthmus tumors (OR=4.526, P=0.001) were at a higher risk of CLNM, and the middle anterior central tumors (OR=0.102, P=0.015) were related with lower risk of LLNM.Conclusions: Stereotactic localization showed the highest predictive value of lymph node metastasis. The middle posterior lateral, inferior anterior central, inferior posterior lateral and isthmus tumors were at a higher risk of CLNM when compared to other locations. For such patients, careful preoperative evaluation of nodal status should be done.

Background: This retrospective study aimed to explore risk factors for liver metastases (LiM) in patients with esophageal cancer (EC) and to identify prognostic factors in patients initially diagnosed with LiM. Methods: A total of 28 654 EC patients were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database from 2010 to 2018. A multivariate logistic regression model was utilized to identify risk factors for LiM. A Cox regression model was used to identify prognostic factors for patients with LiM. Results: Of 28 654 EC patients, 4062 (14.2%) had LiM at diagnosis. The median overall survival (OS) for patients with and without LiM was 6.00 (95% CI: 5.70-6.30) months and 15.00 (95% CI: 14.64-15.36) months, respectively. Variables significantly associated with LiM included gender, age, tumor site, histology, tumor grade, tumor size, clinical T stage, clinical N stage, bone metastases (BoM), brain metastases (BrM) and lung metastases (LuM). Variables independently predicting survival for EC patients with LiM were age, histology, tumor grade, BoM, BrM, LuM, and chemotherapy. A risk prediction model and two survival prediction models were then constructed revealing satisfactory predictive accuracy. Conclusions: Based on the largest known cohort of EC, independent predictors of LiM and prognostic indicators of survival for patients with LiM were identified. Two models for predicting survival as well as a risk prediction model were developed with robust predictive accuracy.

PurposeNewly diagnosed T1-2N0 esophageal cancer (EC) is generally deemed as early local disease, with distant metastases (DM) easily overlooked. This retrospective study aimed to describe the metastatic patterns, identify risk factors and established a risk prediction model for DM in T1-2N0 EC patients.MethodsA total of 4623 T1-2N0 EC patients were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database from 2004 to 2018. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for DM. A nomogram was developed for presentation of the final model.ResultsOf 4623 T1-2N0 patients, 4062 (87.9%) had M0 disease and 561 (12.1%) had M1 disease. The most common metastatic site was liver (n = 156, 47.3%), followed by lung (n = 89, 27.0%), bone (n = 70, 21.2%) and brain (n = 15, 4.5%). Variables independently associated with DM included age at diagnosis, gender, tumor grade, primary site, tumor size and T stage. A nomogram based on the variables had a good predictive accuracy (area under the curve: 0.750). Independent risk factors for bone metastases (BoM), brain metastases (BrM), liver metastases (LiM) and lung metastases (LuM) were identified, respectively.ConclusionsWe identified independent predictive factors for DM, as well as for BoM, BrM, LiM and LuM. Above all, a practical and convenient nomogram with a great accuracy to predict DM probability for T1-2N0 EC patients was established.

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of neck dissection in breast cancer patients who present with ipsilateral supraclavicular lymphnode metastasis (ISLM) without distant metastasis and to reveal the outcomes of neck dissection in different molecular subtypes. Methods: A total of 90 patients with synchronous ISLM and 36 patients with metachronous ISLM without distant metastasis between 2000 and 2009 were retrospectively analyzed. Combined-modality treatments were performed, and patients were respectively divided into two parts according to whether they received neck dissection or not. Results: In the synchronous ISLM group, there was no significant difference between the neck dissection and non-dissection group with respect to age, menstrual status, tumour size, and histological type, PR and HER2 status. Patients with negative ER status and a higher number of positive axillary nodes were more common in the neck dissection group. The five-year locoregional relapse free survival (LRFS) was 63.6% in the neck dissection group VS. 48.9% in the non-dissection group, respectively (P=0.359). The 5-year distant metastasis free survival (DMFS) was 37.3% in the neck dissection group VS. 38.5% in the non-dissection group, respectively (P=0.882). Further analyses were performed by the site of metastases. Results showed that the incidence of bone metastasis was lower in neck dissection patients (14.7% vs. 28.6%, P=0.132). Due to the limited amount of patients, subgroup analysis was just performed in the subtypes with negative ER status, negative PR status and negative HER2 status, respectively. The five-year LRFS of patients receiving neck dissection in the subtypes with negative ER status, negative PR status and negative HER2 status was 63.7%, 59.8%and 61.2%, which was much better than their matched non-dissection group, respectively. However, the difference was not statistically significant. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was similar between the neck dissection and non-dissection group in the subtypes of negative ER status and negative PR status, respectively. However, the 5-year OS of HER2 negative subtype significantly decreased in the neck dissection group (37.2% vs. 65.4%, P=0.032). Besides, it's worth mentioning that in the HER2 positive subtype, the mean time to relapse, metastasis and death was shorter in the neck dissection subgroup compared with the non-dissection subgroup. In the metachronous ISLM group, a trend of better regional control, with similar PFS and OS, was achieved in the neck dissection group. Discussion: Neck dissection is an effective approach to improve the regional control for the patients with ISLM, especially for the subtypes with negative ER status, negative PR status and probably positive HER2 status in the synchronous ISLM. But, it might not be comfortable for the patients with negative HER2 status, because of the unfavorable effect on its overall survival. In addition, neck dissection, with better regional control, might be helpful for the control of bone metastasis, which is beneficial for long term survival. Citation Format: Xiao C, Qi X, Chen A, Zhang W, Zhang P, Cao X. The role of neck dissection in breast cancer patients with synchronous and metachronous ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node metastasis. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-12-15.