No abstract

No abstract

Background Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD)  is the most common subtype of lung cancer. Patient prognosis is poor, and the existing therapeutic strategies for LUAD are far from satisfactory. Recently, targeting N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification of RNA has been suggested as a potential strategy to impede tumor progression. However, the roles of m6A modification in LUAD tumorigenesis is unknown. Methods Global m6A levels and expressions of m6A writers, erasers and readers were evaluated by RNA methylation assay, dot blot, immunoblotting, immunohistochemistry and ELISA in human LUAD, mouse models and cell lines. Cell viability, 3D-spheroid generation, in vivo LUAD formation, experiments in cell- and patient-derived xenograft mice and survival analysis were conducted to explore the impact of m6A on LUAD. The RNA-protein interactions, translation, putative m6A sites and glycolysis were explored in the investigation of the mechanism underlying how m6A stimulates tumorigenesis. Results The elevation of global m6A level in most human LUAD specimens resulted from the combined upregulation of m6A writer methyltransferase 3 (METTL3) and downregulation of eraser alkB homolog 5 (ALKBH5). Elevated global m6A level was associated with a poor overall survival in LUAD patients. Reducing m6A levels by knocking out METTL3 and overexpressing ALKBH5 suppressed 3D-spheroid generation in LUAD cells and intra-pulmonary tumor formation in mice. Mechanistically, m6A-dependent stimulation of glycolysis and tumorigenesis occurred via enolase 1 (ENO1). ENO1 mRNA was m6A methylated at 359 A, which facilitated it’s binding with the m6A reader YTH N6-methyladenosine RNA binding protein 1 (YTHDF1) and resulted in enhanced translation of ENO1. ENO1 positively correlated with METTL3 and global m6A levels, and negatively correlated with ALKBH5 in human LUAD. In addition, m6A-dependent elevation of ENO1 was associated with LUAD progression. In preclinical models, tumors with a higher global m6A level showed a more sensitive response to the inhibition of pan-methylation, glycolysis and ENO activity in LUAD. Conclusions The m6A-dependent stimulation of glycolysis and tumorigenesis in LUAD is at least partially orchestrated by the upregulation of METTL3, downregulation of ALKBH5, and stimulation of YTHDF1-mediated ENO1 translation. Blocking this mechanism may represent a potential treatment strategy for m6A-dependent LUAD.

Formed by back splicing or back fusion of linear RNAs, circular RNAs (circRNAs) constitute a new class of non-coding RNAs of eukaryotes. Recent studies reveal a spliceosome-dependent biogenesis of circRNAs where circRNAs arise at the intron-exon junctions of mRNAs. In this study, using a novel de novo identification method, we show that circRNAs can originate from the interior regions of exons, introns, and intergenic transcripts in human, mouse and rice, which were referred to as interior circRNAs (i-circRNAs). Many i-circRNAs have some remarkable characteristics: multiple i-circRNAs may arise from the same genomic locus; their back fusion points may not be associated with the AG/GT splicing sites, but rather a new pair of motif AC/CT, their back fusion points are adjacent to complementary sequences; and they may circulate on short homologous sequences. We validated several i-circRNAs in HeLa cells by Polymerase Chain Reaction followed by Sanger sequencing. Our results combined showed that i-circRNAs are bona fide circRNAs, indicated novel biogenesis pathways independent of the splicing apparatus, and expanded our understanding of the origin, diversity, and complexity of circRNAs.