OBJECTIVEIn patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), intensive treatment with insulin and/or sulfonylurea (SU) may be associated with excessive increased risk of hypoglycemic episodes. To evaluate the risk of critical arrhythmias related to glycemic variability, we carried out an observational study in type 2 diabetes patients with CVD. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSThirty patients with type 2 diabetes and documented CVD who had been treated with insulin and/or SU underwent 5 days of monitoring with a continuous glucose measurement system along with parallel electrocardiogram recording for monitoring of ventricular arrhythmias. Twelve age-matched patients with documented CVD who received treatment with metformin and/or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor served as the control group. Patients were receiving stable treatment, and were instructed to notice symptoms of arrhythmias and hypoglycemia, respectively. RESULTSWe observed a high incidence of asymptomatic severe episodes of hypoglycemia (<3.1 mmol/L) in patients receiving treatment with insulin and/or SU, whereas severe hypoglycemia did not develop in any of the control subjects. Patients with severe hypoglycemia (n = 12) had a higher number of severe ventricular arrhythmias (patients with versus without severe hypoglycemia, respectively: ventricular couplets 41.7 6 81.8 vs. 5.5 6 16.7; ventricular tachycardia 1.0 6 1.9 vs. 0.1 6 0.3). No direct correlation could be found among different variables of glucose profile, corrected QT interval, and ventricular arrhythmias. CONCLUSIONSOur results suggest that severe episodes of hypoglycemia are associated with an increased risk of severe ventricular arrhythmias.

In conclusion, our study suggests that hypoglycemia might be able to trigger at least under certain circumstances, such as low TSH, ventricular arrhythmias under real-world conditions. The large number of unrecognized HE and VT in vulnerable patients treated with insulin or sulfonylurea should encourage the practitioner to focus on stable glucose control and to search for silent HE.

Levels of vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF) are regulated in a complex network of adipokines, glucose control, and low grade inflammation together with activated platelets, leucocytes, and endothelial dysfunction. Increased levels of VEGF are associated with enhanced angiogenesis and impaired repair mechanisms of vascular lesions in endorgans. Little is known about the interaction of systemic VEGF levels with quality of diabetes control, biomarkers of inflammation, and diabetic nephropathy. Moreover, it is unclear, whether serum and plasma VEGF levels are similarly suited to reflect risk associated with VEGF.In this case control study, we analyzed these parameters in serum and plasma of age and sex matched controls without diabetes (n=99) and type 2 diabetes (n=302). Serum VEGF-A was significantly increased in patients with T2DM while plasma levels were in the same range as for controls. Individual levels varied in a wide range. Serum levels were 4.9 times higher in controls and 7.3 times higher in T2DM as compared to plasma levels. T2DM was associated with significantly higher levels of hsCRP, ALAT, and albumin/creatinine ratio. When calculated for tertiles of HbA1c, we observed a highly significant increase from tertile one to the upper tertile for serum VEGF-A but not for plasma VEGF-A. Correlation analysis revealed a significant relationship between VEGF-A, HbA1c, inflammation, and diabetic nephropathy. Our results indicate that increased VEGF-A levels in T2DM significantly depend on quality of HbA1c control. Serum levels of VEGF-A, with a strong contribution of platelet derived VEGF, better reflect the glycemic burden than plasma levels of VEGF-A. Mechanistic studies are needed to explore links to inflammation and diabetic nephropathy.