Impaired HRT, abnormal TWA, and an EF <0.50 beyond 8 weeks after MI reliably identify patients at risk of serious events. (Assessment of Noninvasive Methods to Identify Patients at Risk of Serious Arrhythmias After a Heart Attack; http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00399503?order=1; NCT00399503).
Background Clinical investigations of shock in cardiac intensive care units (CICUs) have primarily focused on acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMICS). Few studies have evaluated the full spectrum of shock in contemporary CICUs. Methods and Results The Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network is a multicenter network of advanced CICUs in North America. Anytime between September 2017 and September 2018, each center (n=16) contributed a 2-month snap-shot of all consecutive medical admissions to the CICU. Data were submitted to the central coordinating center (TIMI Study Group, Boston, MA). Shock was defined as sustained systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg with end-organ dysfunction ascribed to the hypotension. Shock type was classified by site investigators as cardiogenic, distributive, hypovolemic, or mixed. Among 3049 CICU admissions, 677 (22%) met clinical criteria for shock. Shock type was varied, with 66% assessed as cardiogenic shock (CS), 7% as distributive, 3% as hypovolemic, 20% as mixed, and 4% as unknown. Among patients with CS (n=450), 30% had AMICS, 18% had ischemic cardiomyopathy without AMI, 28% had nonischemic cardiomyopathy, and 17% had a cardiac cause other than primary myocardial dysfunction. Patients with mixed shock had cardiovascular comorbidities similar to patients with CS. The median CICU stay was 4.0 days (interquartile range [IQR], 2.5–8.1 days) for AMICS, 4.3 days (IQR, 2.1–8.5 days) for CS not related to AMI, and 5.8 days (IQR, 2.9–10.0 days) for mixed shock versus 1.9 days (IQR, 1.0–3.6) for patients without shock ( P <0.01 for each). Median Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores were higher in patients with mixed shock (10; IQR, 6–13) versus AMICS (8; IQR, 5–11) or CS without AMI (7; IQR, 5–11; each P <0.01). In-hospital mortality rates were 36% (95% CI, 28%–45%), 31% (95% CI, 26%–36%), and 39% (95% CI, 31%–48%) in AMICS, CS without AMI, and mixed shock, respectively. Conclusions The epidemiology of shock in contemporary advanced CICUs is varied, and AMICS now represents less than one-third of all CS. Despite advanced therapies, mortality in CS and mixed shock remains high. Investigation of management strategies and new therapies to treat shock in the CICU should take this epidemiology into account.
Background-The prognosis and functional capacity of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is poor, and there is a need for safe, effective, inexpensive oral treatments. A single dose of sildenafil, an oral phosphodiesterase type-5 (PD-5) inhibitor, is an effective and selective pulmonary vasodilator in PAH. However, the long-term effects of PD-5 inhibition and its mechanism of action in human pulmonary arteries (PAs) are unknown. Methods and Results-We hypothesized that 3 months of sildenafil (50 mg orally every 8 hours) added to standard treatment would be safe and improve functional capacity and hemodynamics in PAH patients. We studied 5 consecutive patients (4 with primary pulmonary hypertension, 1 with Eisenmenger's syndrome; New York Heart Association class II to III). Functional class improved by Ն1 class in all patients. Pretreatment versus posttreatment values (meanϮSEM) were as follows: 6-minute walk, 376Ϯ30 versus 504Ϯ27 m, PϽ0.0001; mean PA pressure, 70Ϯ3 versus 52Ϯ3 mm Hg, PϽ0.007; pulmonary vascular resistance index 1702Ϯ151 versus 996Ϯ92 dyne · s · cm Ϫ5 · m Ϫ2, PϽ0.006. The systemic arterial pressure was unchanged, and no adverse effects occurred. Sildenafil also reduced right ventricular mass measured by MRI. In 7 human PAs (6 cardiac transplant donors and 1 patient with PAH on autopsy), we showed that PD-5 is present in PA smooth muscle cells and that sildenafil causes relaxation by activating large-conductance, calcium-activated potassium channels. Figure 1. Short-term inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) reduces pulmonary vascular resistance in PAH, 4,5 but ambulatory delivery in humans is cumbersome. Another strategy is to prolong the survival of cGMP in PASMCs by inhibiting type-5 phosphodiesterase (PD-5), an isoform that is primarily located in the penis and lungs, which rapidly degrades cGMP. Because of PD-5's tissue distribution (pulmonaryϾsystemic vasculature), PD-5 inhibitors are attractive candidate pulmonary vasodilators that minimally decrease systemic blood pressure. (75 mg) is an effective and relatively selective pulmonary vasodilator. 4,5 We hypothesized that PD-5 inhibition acutely causes human PA dilatation, in part by opening of BK Ca channels, and that it chronically improves hemodynamics and functional capacity in moderately severe PAH. Conclusion-This MethodsWe studied 5 consecutive patients with PAH (nϭ4 New York Heart Association [NYHA] class III; patient 3 class II). All subjects provided informed consent. Patients with class IV PAH were excluded because they often require epoprostenol, which could confound the assessment of sildenafil's effects. All the patients had been stable for Ͼ3 months, and their standard therapy was not altered before initiation of sildenafil. All were on diuretics and coumadin, and patients 2 and 4 were on Ca 2ϩ channel blockers because they had been shown to respond to iNO with Ͼ20% decrease in pulmonary vascular resistance (Figure 2). No patient was taking nitrates. All patients had primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH) except patient 2, w...
This trial extends the observation of the beneficial angiographic effects of lipid-lowering therapy to normocholesterolemic patients. The implications of the neutral angiographic effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition are uncertain, but they deserve further investigation in light of the positive clinical benefits suggested here and seen elsewhere.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.