Background: Os acromiale is an anatomic variant in which the acromial ossification center fails to fuse. It may lead to painful shoulder conditions and surgical intervention may be required for treatment. The prevalence of os acromiale in South Koreans (0.7%) has previously been the representative number for the Asian population, and it is lower than that in the Black and White populations. Purpose: To determine the prevalence of os acromiale in Thai patients with shoulder disabilities who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the MRI scans of patients with shoulder disabilities between January 2019 and May 2021 at a single institution. The relationship of sex, age, and shoulder diagnosis to the presence of os acromiale was then analyzed. Results: A total of 940 MRI scans in 848 patients were evaluated, of which 20 shoulders were detected to have os acromiale, a prevalence of 2.13%. The mean age of the patients was 60.25 years, with 60% being female and 40% male. Of the 20 os acromiale cases, 17 (85%) were preacromiale, 1 (5%) mesoacromiale, and 2 (10%) meta-acromiale. The associated diagnoses were as follows: 75%, full-thickness rotator cuff (RC) tear; 10%, partial-thickness RC tear; 5%, RC tendinopathy with symptomatic os acromiale; 5%, anterior shoulder instability with full-thickness RC tear; and 5%, frozen shoulder. Age, sex, and associated shoulder disability were not associated with the presence of os acromiale. Conclusion: In Thai patients with shoulder problems who required MRI evaluation, the prevalence of os acromiale was 2.13%. This is lower than the prevalence from other ethnic groups but slightly higher than that from the same ethnic group (Korea). There was no relation between the presence of os acromiale and shoulder pain, regardless of diagnosis.
Background: The Jobe test is commonly used to diagnose full-thickness (FT) supraspinatus (SSP) tendon tear. The original Jobe test used single-arm testing, although the double-arm Jobe test has also been used in clinical practice. Purpose: To evaluate the reliability, accuracy, and diagnostic value of the single-arm and double-arm Jobe test for diagnosis of FT SSP tear. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Patients with shoulder pain requiring magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the shoulder between March 1, 2021, and March 31, 2022, were enrolled. Each patient underwent both single-arm and double-arm Jobe tests by 2 orthopaedic surgeons independently, and the presence of pain, weakness, or both during the test was documented. Diagnosis of FT SSP tear on MRI scan was used as the gold standard to compare the diagnostic value of the Jobe test. The interrater reliability of the Jobe test, and the inter- and intrarater reliability of the MRI evaluation (patients with vs without FT SSP tear) was performed using the kappa (κ) coefficient. Results: A total of 80 patients (57 females [71%]; mean age, 61.46 ± 9.61 years) were included. MRI scans revealed FT SSP tears in 32 (40%) of the patients. Both single- and double-arm Jobe tests had low diagnostic values (accuracy, 46.25% to 60%; sensitivity, 46.9% to 84.4%; specificity, 25% to 66.7%). The single-arm test with weakness revealed the highest sensitivity (84.4%). The double-arm test with weakness plus pain revealed the highest specificity (66.7%). Double-arm testing with pain had the highest accuracy (60%), with the highest positive likelihood ratio (1.5). The interrater reliability of the Jobe test indicated substantial agreement (double-arm vs single-arm, κ = 0.771 and 0.716, respectively, agreement 85%; P < .05). The interrater reliability of MRI scan evaluation of the FT SSP tear indicated substantial agreement (κ = 0.750, agreement 85%; P < .05), while the intrarater reliability indicated almost perfect agreement (κ = 0.917, agreement 96%; P < .05). Conclusion: The Jobe test, either single- or double-arm, had low accuracy and diagnostic value in diagnosing FT SSP tear. The concern with a single-arm examination for weakness is that it may be an inappropriate diagnostic test for ruling out FT SSP with 84% sensitivity, while a double-arm examination provides a higher specificity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.