The sphygmomanometer is a widely used device for non-invasive blood pressure measurement. Systematic measurement errors and uncertainties can affect measurements, consequently, impacting diagnosis or medication. In order to maintain the conformity of the instruments, sphygmomanometers are usually under control of legal metrology demanding periodical verifications. Automated sphygmomanometers are based on the oscillometric method, measuring small changes of arterial blood pressure occurring in the cuff. Once pressure working standards are unable to generate the oscillometric pulses, verifications are performed on the sphygmomanometer on its manometer mode, disregarding the contribution of the oscillometric mode to the uncertainties. The present study investigates the contribution of the oscillometric method to the expanded measurement uncertainty. We used a patient simulator in four sphygmomanometers available in the market for consumers. The results show that the contribution of the oscillometric mode to the expanded uncertainty can be significant, varying from 0.16 to 1.56 mmHg and from 0.12 to 1.55 mmHg, for 100 and 150 mmHg, respectively. We also observed different contributions to the uncertainty for systolic and diastolic blood pressure.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.