No abstract

The occurrence of supraventricular arrhythmias is associated with an unfavourable prognosis in septic shock. Available trials are difficult to apply in sepsis and septic shock patients due to included cohorts, control groups and because "one size does not fit all". The priorities in the critically ill are maintenance of the sinus rhythm and diastolic ventricular filling. The rate control modality should be reserved for chronic AF and in situations when the sinus rhythm is difficult to maintain due to extreme stress conditions resulting from a high dosage of vasoactive agents. Electric cardioversion is indicated in unstable patients with an absence of contraindications and is more feasible in combination with an antiarrhythmic agent. Besides amiodarone being preferred for its lower cardiodepressant side effect compared to other agents, drugs with a different degree of betablocking activity are very useful in supraventricular arrhythmias and septic shock, providing echocardiography is routinely used to support their indications within the current summary of product characteristics. A typical patient benefiting from propafenone is without significant structural heart disease, i.e. typically with normal to moderately reduced left ventricular systolic function. Future research should be channelled towards echocardiography-guided prospective controlled trials on antiarrhythmic therapy which may clarify the issue of rhythm versus rate control, the effects of various antiarrhythmic drugs, and a place for electric cardioversion in critically ill patients in septic shock.

Despite increasing clinical experience with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), its optimal indications remain unclear. Here, we externally evaluated all currently available ECMO survival-predicting scoring systems and the APACHE II score in subjects undergoing veno-venous ECMO (VV ECMO) support due to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) with influenza (IVA) and non-influenza (n-IVA) etiologies. Our aim was to find the best scoring system for influenza A ARDS ECMO success prediction. Retrospective data were analyzed to assess the abilities of the PRESERVE, RESP, PRESET, ECMOnet, Roch, and APACHE II scores to predict patient outcome. Patients treated with veno-venous ECMO support for ARDS were divided into two groups: IVA and n-IVA etiologies. Parameters collected within 24 hours before ECMO initiation were used to calculate PRESERVE, RESP, PRESET, ECMOnet, Roch, and APACHE II scores. Compared to the IVA group, the n-IVA group exhibited significantly higher ICU, 28-day, and 6-month mortality (P = .043, .034, and .047, respectively). Regarding ECMO support success predictions, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.62 for PRESERVE, 0.44 for RESP, 0.57 for PRESET, and 0.67 for ECMOnet, and 0.62 for Roch calculated for all subjects according to the original papers. In the IVA group, APACHE II had the best predictive value for ICU, hospital, 28-day, and 6-month mortality (AUC values of 0.73, 0.73, 0.70, and 0.73, respectively). In the n-IVA group, APACHE II was the best predictor of survival in the ICU and hospital (AUC 0.54 and 0.57, respectively). From all possible ECMO survival scoring systems, the APACHE II score had the best predictive value for VV ECMO subjects with ARDS caused by influenza A-related pneumonia with a cut-off value of about 32 points.

No abstract

Introduction: Data on management of severe accidental hypothermia published from an established high-volume extracorporeal membrane oxygenation centre are scarce. Methods: A total of 28 patients with intravesical temperature lower than 28°C on admission were either treated with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or rewarmed conservatively. Results: A total of 10 patients rewarmed on veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (age: 37 ± 12.6 years) and 18 conservatively (age: 55.2 ± 11.2 years) were collected over a course of 5 years. The dominant cause was alcohol intoxication with exposure to cold (39%), 12 patients were resuscitated prior to admission. The admission temperature in the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation group (23.8 ± 2.6°C) was lower than in the non–extracorporeal membrane oxygenation group (26.0 ± 1.5°C, p = 0.01). The peripheral percutaneous veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was always cannulated in malignant arrhythmias causing refractory cardiac arrest. The typical extracorporeal membrane oxygenation blood flow was 3-4 L/minute and sweep gas flow 2 L/minute, the median extracorporeal membrane oxygenation duration was 48.3 (28.1-86.7) hours. The median rates of rewarming did not differ (0.41 (0.35-0.7)°C/hour in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and 0.77 (0.54-0.98)°C/hour in non–extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, p = 0.46) as well as the admission arterial lactate, pH and potassium. Their development was not different between the groups except for higher pH between the third and ninth hour of rewarming in the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation group. The hospital mortality was 10% in the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation group and 11.1% in the non–extracorporeal membrane oxygenation group with the median last Glasgow Coma Scale 15 and Cerebral Performance Score 1. Conclusion: Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe hypothermia shows promising outcome data collected in an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation/extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation centre located in a European urban area. Except for presence of refractory cardiac arrest, the established hypothermia-related prognostic indicators did not differ between patients in need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and those rewarmed without extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.